top | item 10023174

(no title)

baseballmerpeak | 10 years ago

Essentially, one database to rule them all?

discuss

order

brianxq3|10 years ago

It is very much the opposite. With this pattern, you're going to have lots of copies of your data in different transformations in potentially many different data stores. The idea is that you take the stream of changes from something like Postgres and use that stream to populate caches, indexes, denormalizations/representations, counts, etc.

akkartik|10 years ago

One append-only data structure to rule all them databases.