(no title)
sown | 10 years ago
At the very least you now learned about them. I want you to read this: http://mikerowe.com/2015/08/otw-rejection/
And let me relate to you: I get turned down for jobs all the time. It is not because of capricious reasons that I wish were the case, but it's because of me not knowing something. Yes, it's maddening because they throw out good candidates along with the bad to minimize risk to them. The same facts happen to me and you, but try to have the perspective on them be as positive as you can.
jmckib|10 years ago
blazespin|10 years ago
dragonwriter|10 years ago
That's not to say that failing to know that terminology should automatically result in rejection, but understanding that is not an unreasonable expectation when hiring something other than a narrow-focus language-specific code grinder.
CHY872|10 years ago
Having said that, I'd be minded to look dimly on a candidate who tried to sidestep that question with 'but I use Python and they're the same there, so it's just a question of semantics' and did not try to clarify the question with me.
ritchiea|10 years ago
ThrustVectoring|10 years ago
It's a principle-agent problem - having a strict filter gives the interviewer a way to deflect blame when they hire a bad candidate. This is at the expense of the company both through additional bad hires and through extra time and money spent interviewing.
reagency|10 years ago
bigdubs|10 years ago