top | item 10097242 (no title) reasonishy | 10 years ago They're not going to ban encryption. Seriously. Stop wasting time on misquotes taken out of context blown up by The Guardian. There's more important things to worry about. discuss order hn newest retube|10 years ago exactly, guardian trolling at it's finest tankenmate|10 years ago The point of this petition, even though it looks at first blush to be taking down a straw man, is to send a shot across the bow. andybak|10 years ago Either:a) they ban all end-to-end encryptionorb) this law is ridiculously easy to circumvent for even non-technical usersAn example of b) would be: piggyback messaging on an existing service that has a valid reason for being encrypted nailer|10 years ago Mandating back doors is banning effective encryption. digital-rubber|10 years ago [deleted]
tankenmate|10 years ago The point of this petition, even though it looks at first blush to be taking down a straw man, is to send a shot across the bow. andybak|10 years ago Either:a) they ban all end-to-end encryptionorb) this law is ridiculously easy to circumvent for even non-technical usersAn example of b) would be: piggyback messaging on an existing service that has a valid reason for being encrypted
andybak|10 years ago Either:a) they ban all end-to-end encryptionorb) this law is ridiculously easy to circumvent for even non-technical usersAn example of b) would be: piggyback messaging on an existing service that has a valid reason for being encrypted
retube|10 years ago
tankenmate|10 years ago
andybak|10 years ago
a) they ban all end-to-end encryption
or
b) this law is ridiculously easy to circumvent for even non-technical users
An example of b) would be: piggyback messaging on an existing service that has a valid reason for being encrypted
nailer|10 years ago
digital-rubber|10 years ago
[deleted]