This is really cool. If I remember right international passenger flight regulations insist that there be atleast one airport that can handle your class of aircraft within 180 minutes of flying time at one engine operative speeds at all times. If we assume a passenger jet flies at roughly 0.8 Mach or ~960 kph, and one-engine operative speed is roughly 40% of that or ~384 KPH. That means an airport needs to be within a circle of radius 1152 kms. That's an area of ~4.16M km-squared. Simplifying that all airports can handle all passenger jets, not one of those voronoi cells can have an area greater than 4.16M km-squared.
Is there an easy way to calculate the area of each cell?
The regulations you're thinking of are ETOPS (Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards or, alternatively, Engines Turn or Passengers Swim).
"Regulation 14 CFR 121.161 requires four-engine passenger airplanes built after February 2015 to observe ETOPS if the flight route is more than 180 minutes (3 hours)"
Virgin Australia briefly ran a service from Melbourne to Johannesburg using 777s, which was 2 hours longer than it needed to be for this reason. Looking at this map, it's clear why: the great circle path almost goes over Antarctica, and the closest airports over the path are in Australia and South Africa.
It’s projecting thousands of sphere geodesics at pixel precision via breaking them into a large number (hundreds of thousands?) of little line segments and evaluating several expensive nonlinear functions at each of those points with considerable Javascript dataflow overhead for each one, not to mention the cost of putting thousands of polygons with dozens or hundreds of points each into SVG.
It would take either a domain expert or someone willing to spend a few months studying the problem to write an optimized version, but then it could probably be made to run a couple orders of magnitude faster by using slightly coarser approximations for various function evaluations (no need for 10^-15 precision for drawing on screen), or by simplifying the problem to require fewer function evaluations overall (e.g. by using Bézier curve segments instead of straight line segments), rewriting the core of the library to be vectorized, and rendering via a raster- rather than DOM-based drawing system. I’m sure a GPU could handle such a problem very effectively, though working with WebGL might be a pain.
It's amazing how fast computers are. And it's amazing how slow we make them with layers and layers of cruft built atop more layers and layers of cruft.
Hmmm, which one is the result of a team of experts competing with other major corporate entities, getting paid to optimize a set of well-known algorithms for months prior to delivery to an audience of millions who will spend thousands of hours with it and which one is a one-off hack meant to demo the first iteration of some new code for the first time on its new platform?
I know right?? It's mind-blowing! My PC can push millions (is that the order of magnitude?) of polygons per second. But it locks up an entire core to render a couple hundred polygons (plus the layers of cruft), and can't do it at more than ~10Hz.
It's not smooth, but totally usable on my i7-3770K workstation.
For what it's worth, it's also fun that key elements of the text are dynamic. When I first landed on the page with noscript suppressing any script, I saw:
> Most Remote Airport
> … at … is the most remote; from the nearest airport, .
Usually if I see any text, I don't bother enabling script, so this confused me. Luckily I did enable the script and then saw the principle UI element on the page. :)
What a cool project! This is very fun to play with in conjunction with the ETOPS (extended twin-engine operations) settings on the Great Circle Mapper. http://www.gcmap.com
Among other things it drives home how remote the waters MH370 disappeared in are.
I recently did ORD-HKG and spent quite a lot of time thinking about ETOPS diversion airports over Siberia (because honestly what else are you gonna do). Now I'm wondering if you can even land a fully laden 777 at any of them. Most of them don't even seem to have wikipedia pages.
Easter Island doesn't just have an airport on it, it's got an airport with a runway built long enough to accommodate the Space Shuttle.
It's an awesome place to visit - a town of a few thousand people, surprisingly good food, breathtaking moai, and due to its relative remoteness, not particularly crowded with tourists. I liked it enough to want to go back.
I flew to IPC (aka Easter Island Airport) in 2013. It actually has a massive runway due to being a Space Shuttle diversion site, although the terminal itself is a glorified shack. Flying there (from Santiago) was a bit terrifying knowing how far away you are from any alternate airport, or any civilization at all really.
As a South African, I never realised we have a few airports that are actually the closest to a large part of the Antarctic coast. I know there are flights from Chile and New Zealand to Antarctica, but none that I'm aware of from South Africa.
You are in fact correct that the boundaries of the Voronoi cells on a non-Euclidean manifold need not be geodesics. Consider for instance the manifold which is a cone with a circular base, and let the sample points be the apex of the cone and the center of the base. The boundary of the two cells thus produced will be a circle parallel to the base, which is not a geodesic on the cone.
Hm, appears to be missing a lot of smaller airports in the USA. My home airport (E45) in particular. I'm guessing it's only using airports that have commercial air carrier service of some sort.
They're using OurAirports data, filtered to exclude all but "large" and "medium" airports. Anything smaller than that includes all sorts of cruft like African bush landing strips, heliports, etc.
This is the type of thing that's so simple and rewarding that it makes me annoyed that I hadn't thought of it and made it first! Really cool, good work!
Neat, but it would be nice if it could zoom out a little more or adjust to the browser window size. I have 2560x1600 display split into four equally sized panes, and it's difficult to use and view in a single pane.
[+] [-] slake|10 years ago|reply
Is there an easy way to calculate the area of each cell?
Did I mention this is really cool!!
[+] [-] oostevo|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dingaling|10 years ago|reply
http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2014-05-28-Boeing-Receives-330-M...
ETOPS also now applies to new-build quads.
"Regulation 14 CFR 121.161 requires four-engine passenger airplanes built after February 2015 to observe ETOPS if the flight route is more than 180 minutes (3 hours)"
[+] [-] simonbyrne|10 years ago|reply
Virgin Australia briefly ran a service from Melbourne to Johannesburg using 777s, which was 2 hours longer than it needed to be for this reason. Looking at this map, it's clear why: the great circle path almost goes over Antarctica, and the closest airports over the path are in Australia and South Africa.
[+] [-] golergka|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jacobolus|10 years ago|reply
It would take either a domain expert or someone willing to spend a few months studying the problem to write an optimized version, but then it could probably be made to run a couple orders of magnitude faster by using slightly coarser approximations for various function evaluations (no need for 10^-15 precision for drawing on screen), or by simplifying the problem to require fewer function evaluations overall (e.g. by using Bézier curve segments instead of straight line segments), rewriting the core of the library to be vectorized, and rendering via a raster- rather than DOM-based drawing system. I’m sure a GPU could handle such a problem very effectively, though working with WebGL might be a pain.
Anyway, go for it!
[+] [-] forrestthewoods|10 years ago|reply
It's amazing how fast computers are. And it's amazing how slow we make them with layers and layers of cruft built atop more layers and layers of cruft.
[+] [-] t2015_08_25|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrepd|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bhauer|10 years ago|reply
For what it's worth, it's also fun that key elements of the text are dynamic. When I first landed on the page with noscript suppressing any script, I saw:
> Most Remote Airport
> … at … is the most remote; from the nearest airport, .
Usually if I see any text, I don't bother enabling script, so this confused me. Luckily I did enable the script and then saw the principle UI element on the page. :)
[+] [-] mozumder|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mizzao|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shitsandwich|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] teraflop|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Xophmeister|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HNLogInsSuckAss|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] idlewords|10 years ago|reply
Among other things it drives home how remote the waters MH370 disappeared in are.
[+] [-] minimax|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phkahler|10 years ago|reply
1) This appears to be only airports that offer commercial passenger service.
2) Easter Island has an airport! I was under the impression you could only get there by boat.
[+] [-] gyardley|10 years ago|reply
It's an awesome place to visit - a town of a few thousand people, surprisingly good food, breathtaking moai, and due to its relative remoteness, not particularly crowded with tourists. I liked it enough to want to go back.
[+] [-] dalke|10 years ago|reply
The upgrade of the runway to support the Shuttle started in May 1986 (https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=19860423&id=... ) and ended by August 1987 (https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=860&dat=19870817&id=Y... ).
[+] [-] ape4|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jcdavis|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Mchl|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trose|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] msrpotus|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dublinben|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] CarVac|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] 13hours|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Kenji|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] nilkn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rspeer|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wlievens|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] VikingCoder|10 years ago|reply
So, run Voronoi on 3D points that happen to all be on the sphere... Then intersect the polytopes with a sphere. Tada - great arcs.
[+] [-] exupero|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lkrubner|10 years ago|reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=627&v=hzLAX_pr-Wc
[+] [-] jzawodn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jpatokal|10 years ago|reply
http://ourairports.com/data/
[+] [-] megablast|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vpontis|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Faint|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ghayes|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] svisser|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] naz|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jlarocco|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ahh|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] saganus|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ggchappell|10 years ago|reply