[wicker]

On the front page, it says "The content presented here is suitable for self-study by those wishing to learn Python for astronomy or other scientific research applications."

Right below that, it says "The workshop material here was presented in the Spring of 2011 at the Harvard / Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. A range of about 25 to 50 people participated in the different workshops, which were 1.5 hours in duration. Based on our experience a 2 hour slot would have been more reasonable to allow time for the exercises and discussion."

It sounds like this was a series of workshops that were presented, and the material collected and released as reference for anybody else who wants to take initiative in their own communities.

This brings up a good question, though. What are the reasonable expectations for people who make their reference materials online after they're done with the initial conference talk or workshop, and have moved on to something else?

[Bjartr]

A thank you for putting up the materials at all when they had no obligation to.