^ You know, we laugh about this but in the next decade we may very well be able to deploy payloads into space just by clicking a few buttons like any other online shopping. They may even pick up the shipment right from our facilities with their drones.
Arianespace does that with their Ariane V, but it comes with organizational headaches, because you need two payloads of appropriate mass, that are ready at the same time, and that go into the same orbital plane. If one payload is delayed (happens often enough), you can't shuffle the other one around on short notice.
>It's interesting that Falcon Heavy costs 1.5x as much as Falcon 9, but carries 4x the payload.
where did you get that numbers from? the page says $60m for ~4.85t to GTO for F9 and $90m for 6.4t to GTO for FH. price for maximum performance isn't quoted; i believe without reusability it'll be about 3x F9 (there's three F9's in the FH, after all).
saw that a little while ago. it's fun you can now purchase a lift in LEO and with a direct quote even!
so, doing some weird math, you can get about 5000 person ashes in LEO for about 62M, so one could theoretically (I think law forbids it) run a kickstarter campaign to get people ashes in space for 15k each.
Just think of the possibilities! private launch space with a price allows all people a fair access to space (still pricey, but fair)
I think they only send up a small sample of the ashes rather than the whole urn though. They charge $2k so there's probably some good margins if you can do the same with SpaceX.
There are many small and light relics of Jesus, both Marys etc around. How about a kickstarter campaign to send one into low earth orbit to watch over us all?
The different payload masses are most likely for different grades of reusability: all cores expendable, center core expendable + boosters reusable, fully reusable.
Hard to tell for sure, because SpaceX has, to the best of my knowledge, never provided details regarding which Falcon Heavy configuration delivers the 6.4 mT to GTO.*
* probably a 1800 m/s to GSO, 26° inclination orbit
Using the smaller Falcon 9 you could send approximately 1500 people's ashes in to space (assuming an average of 3kg left after cremation for each person), at a cost of $39,000 each.
If you found this interesting, I would recommend taking a look at https://www.astrobotic.com/configure-mission, another "space travel pricing page" - this one gives tweakable parameters that change the price, which is nice.
Sidenote: It's absolutely amazing that we can now get a satellite orbiting the Moon for $200k.
It is completely standard to seek to launch over the ocean. The spaceports in Florida and Guiana are where they are because of that and because it is easier to launch towards the east. Where launches aren't over the ocean they are usually over very sparsely populated territory (as is the case for Baikonur).
If you buy a launch ticket with your chase sapphire card, you can get free travel insurance with coverage for baggage losses. Do telecom satellites count as baggage? Some cards also offer warranty-type protections on your purchases. Seems like a smart move.
Judging from the landings legs on heavy center stage, they are planning to land it, but where? It will be flying much higher and faster than the side boosters I believe.
the Saturn V, the rocket that sent men to the moon could send 140,000 kg to LEO and 48,600 kg on a translunar injection, which is a higher orbit (i.e. takes more energy) than a geostationary transfer. It's estimated that it cost upwards of a billion dollars per Saturn V launch.
Is there an easy to understand resource somewhere that covers issues related to the rocket equation, inclination angles, low and geosynchronous orbit requirements?
I would like a better understanding of the math and physics of what it takes to get a vehicle up to various altitudes and orbits.
[+] [-] anemic|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mholt|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scottcanoni|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ceejayoz|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lalwanivikas|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] something123|10 years ago|reply
Either way - I'd wait it out. They'll drop the price for black friday
[+] [-] vermontdevil|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] utuxia|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] robodale|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] smpetrey|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wener|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] devit|10 years ago|reply
Why doesn't SpaceX offer the Falcon Heavy exclusively and launch multiple payloads per launch, thus more than halving costs?
Are there payload volume or orbit separation limitations or is the pricing info not complete?
[+] [-] adwn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baq|10 years ago|reply
where did you get that numbers from? the page says $60m for ~4.85t to GTO for F9 and $90m for 6.4t to GTO for FH. price for maximum performance isn't quoted; i believe without reusability it'll be about 3x F9 (there's three F9's in the FH, after all).
[+] [-] LoSboccacc|10 years ago|reply
so, doing some weird math, you can get about 5000 person ashes in LEO for about 62M, so one could theoretically (I think law forbids it) run a kickstarter campaign to get people ashes in space for 15k each.
Just think of the possibilities! private launch space with a price allows all people a fair access to space (still pricey, but fair)
[+] [-] ukoki|10 years ago|reply
I think they only send up a small sample of the ashes rather than the whole urn though. They charge $2k so there's probably some good margins if you can do the same with SpaceX.
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] TomGullen|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Arnt|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mholt|10 years ago|reply
And these prices may go down dramatically after the first stages prove themselves reusable (depending on SpaceX's strategy).
[+] [-] utuxia|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phkahler|10 years ago|reply
But down below we see 4850kg and 21,200kg which seems more likely.
[+] [-] Gravityloss|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baq|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dougmwne|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mrfusion|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] larrydag|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mrfusion|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adwn|10 years ago|reply
Hard to tell for sure, because SpaceX has, to the best of my knowledge, never provided details regarding which Falcon Heavy configuration delivers the 6.4 mT to GTO.*
* probably a 1800 m/s to GSO, 26° inclination orbit
[+] [-] vladd|10 years ago|reply
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_transfer_orbit
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit
[+] [-] onion2k|10 years ago|reply
I wonder if that could be a viable business.
[+] [-] owenversteeg|10 years ago|reply
Sidenote: It's absolutely amazing that we can now get a satellite orbiting the Moon for $200k.
[+] [-] vinceyuan|10 years ago|reply
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_launch_market_competitio...
[+] [-] sbarre|10 years ago|reply
I guess that makes sense, if your super secret launch payload is going to fail, better that it falls in the ocean?
[+] [-] jarek|10 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport#Placement_considerat...
[+] [-] than|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] knodi123|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pluma|10 years ago|reply
Unless you're flying into space.
[+] [-] marktangotango|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Already__Taken|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] hit8run|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baldfat|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmd|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] allsystemsgo|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] benihana|10 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_IV_Heavy
the Saturn V, the rocket that sent men to the moon could send 140,000 kg to LEO and 48,600 kg on a translunar injection, which is a higher orbit (i.e. takes more energy) than a geostationary transfer. It's estimated that it cost upwards of a billion dollars per Saturn V launch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V
Basically, this is a powerful and freaking cheap rocket.
[+] [-] rebootthesystem|10 years ago|reply
I would like a better understanding of the math and physics of what it takes to get a vehicle up to various altitudes and orbits.
[+] [-] idlewords|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]