Back in my high school Basic Electronics class (more then 30 years ago, now) we had to draw the schematics for electronics projects of our choosing. I tended to specialize in "useless machines", much to my instructor's befuddlement.
My favorite was the "solar-powered nightlight", which was a solar panel wired directly to a lightbulb.
After seeing a video of such a machine I just had to have one of my own. Normal 0 According to Wikipedia, Claude E. Shannon built the first “Ultimate Machine” based on an idea by Marvin Minsky.
Very fun in that it appears to be alive in some way and allows the user to project feelings/emotions onto it.
To me, it looks like the machine is bothered when the user flips the switch and wants to be left alone. Of course, that's ridiculous, but that's the fun of the machine.
I really like this thing, but I don't see why it has to be even this complex. Although since the servo is powered in both directions, the machine will work even when upside down.
A simpler alternative would have a STSP switch with a battery and motor. When you turn the switch on the motor raises the arm and switches itself off, a weight on the arm could lower it. Then again my version wouldn't work in zero gravity.
I can imagine one with a crank and a flywheel, where pumping enough energy into the flywheel mechanically activates a hand that cranks in the opposite direction to discharge the potential...
[+] [-] michael_dorfman|16 years ago|reply
My favorite was the "solar-powered nightlight", which was a solar panel wired directly to a lightbulb.
[+] [-] pohl|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gruseom|16 years ago|reply
The original has an uncanny hand which changes the character of the device from purely mechanical to somehow philosophical.
(Normally I'd dig up a link, but I don't have time right now.)
[+] [-] dschobel|16 years ago|reply
After seeing a video of such a machine I just had to have one of my own. Normal 0 According to Wikipedia, Claude E. Shannon built the first “Ultimate Machine” based on an idea by Marvin Minsky.
[+] [-] nudded|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tel|16 years ago|reply
http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/03/the_unspeakab...
[+] [-] tungstenfurnace|16 years ago|reply
Ford Prefect: Don't.
Arthur Dent: [presses it] Oh.
Ford Prefect: What happened?
Arthur Dent: A sign lit up saying "Please do not press this button again."
[+] [-] mseebach|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slapshot|16 years ago|reply
To me, it looks like the machine is bothered when the user flips the switch and wants to be left alone. Of course, that's ridiculous, but that's the fun of the machine.
[+] [-] JeremyChase|16 years ago|reply
A simpler alternative would have a STSP switch with a battery and motor. When you turn the switch on the motor raises the arm and switches itself off, a weight on the arm could lower it. Then again my version wouldn't work in zero gravity.
[+] [-] RiderOfGiraffes|16 years ago|reply
http://www.andrewlipson.com/lego.htm
This is the same Lipson as in the Lipson-Shiu Corporate Type Test
http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LipsonShiuTest.html?HN
[+] [-] thinkbohemian|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pavel_lishin|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noodle|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] derefr|16 years ago|reply