[alialkhatib]

For anyone that's curious, the article is here: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/natu...

I'd complain about the WSJ's practice of not properly referencing the study, but I'm afraid that's becoming about as played out as the complaints about paywalls.

[melling]

The headline points to the Washington Post, not the WSJ. Did someone change it?

[dang]

No, I think the GP meant WP.