I'd be very interested to see RethinkDB analyzed, particularly with the 2.1 release promising high availability through Raft. RethinkDB and Aphyr have talked about doing Jepsen tests for it, but I'm not sure where that's landed (https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/1493).
Not sure why anyone would want to play video (I guess it's a video? I don't do Flash either) through Flash nowadays... Isn't it easier and better to just use HTML video tag?
Fair point. For RethinkDB, I think there's a good business case for getting it tested sooner than later (on both sides). For aphyr who's leaving Stripe, I think it would be reasonable for RethinkDB to compensate him for an unbiased study, given that they have $12M+ in funding. A positive report could generate a lot of attention for RethinkDB and give confidence to larger enterprises who are very hesitant of trying anything remotely "new" or "experimental" in the DB space.
Why isn't PostgreSQL in the list on the first page? It is in the [blog posts] page though.
I would love to see the multixact data corruption problems introduced in 9.3 analyzed, and see if he can verify them to be solved in the latest version.
(Not author) but from what I remember PostreSQL was a bit of a funny case. It was about partitions between clients and a single database server. In most other cases, it was analysis of distributed back-end server instances. Not that those failures are not important but it is just harder to compare it seems with the others.
Not quite sure whether something like multixact data corruption is symptomatic of the kind of underlying issues in database system implementations that Jepsen is after. I may be wrong though.
I really dig the Riak test. One of the best comparison of LWW and CRDT. Also very good conclusion, tl; dr: If you don't use idempotent writes, you are going to have bad time.
On a human note: Kyle is brave as fuck for stepping out into the black unknown yawning abyss to try to do this under his own banner. Bravo, Kyle, and may you find incredible success.
The other side to that coin is that these reports are always in the top of the front page of HN, and likely on Reddit, also. They are popular because they are great, and I don't want to live in a world where people can't be paid fairly to do great things.
Jepsen was developed by aphyr/kyle. Stripe hired him early this year (January 2015[0]), I understand in part to support his Jepsen work, but he's been working on it since 2013[1].
So to answer the question, no Jepsen was not "developed at stripe" though part of its development probably happened there.
[+] [-] willchen|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coffeemug|10 years ago|reply
EDIT: don't mean to speak for him though; I hope this is ok.
[+] [-] OMGWTF|10 years ago|reply
> Get the latest Flash player to view this content
No, I won't. This scares me too much: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-53/p...
[+] [-] annnnd|10 years ago|reply
Not sure why anyone would want to play video (I guess it's a video? I don't do Flash either) through Flash nowadays... Isn't it easier and better to just use HTML video tag?
[+] [-] fowlduck|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mdaniel|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] striking|10 years ago|reply
>> Can you test X next?
> Tests take about a month. I do take suggestions into consideration, but I can't promise you anything. Backlog is a few years long at this point.
(from https://aphyr.com/about)
[+] [-] mcfunley|10 years ago|reply
> For folks who would like to pay for a Jepsen analysis, email [email protected]. I've got one client lined up but I'll keep in touch. :)
https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/656279505879744512
[+] [-] willchen|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] headcanon|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TeMPOraL|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] annnnd|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JoelJacobson|10 years ago|reply
I would love to see the multixact data corruption problems introduced in 9.3 analyzed, and see if he can verify them to be solved in the latest version.
[+] [-] rdtsc|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amitlan|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] threeseed|10 years ago|reply
Apples and Oranges.
[+] [-] jhasse|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 885895|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HNLogInsSuckAss|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] eddd|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rspeer|10 years ago|reply
(The problem, then, is that data structures with all these properties are hard to find.)
[+] [-] felixgallo|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mdaniel|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] doomrobo|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] masklinn|10 years ago|reply
So to answer the question, no Jepsen was not "developed at stripe" though part of its development probably happened there.
[0] https://twitter.com/avibryant/status/561315494204952579
[1] https://aphyr.com/posts/281-call-me-maybe-carly-rae-jepsen-a...
[+] [-] buryat|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MCRed|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mbesto|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] HNLogInsSuckAss|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] votemedown|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]