"When possible, refer all matters to committees, for "further study and consideration." Attempt to make the committees as large as possible - never less than five.
Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.
Misunderstand orders. Ask endless questions or engage in long correspondence about such orders. Quibble over them when you can.
Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.
Be unreasonable and urge your fellow-conferees to be "reasonable" and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.
Don't order new working' materials until your current stocks have been virtually exhausted, so that the slightest delay in filling your order will mean a shutdown.
To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.
Fill out forms illegibly so that they will have to be done over; make mistakes or omit requested information in forms.
Spread disturbing rumors that sound like inside dope."
Seems like items 1-4 are strongly in effect at most places I've been to, unintentionally of course. The statements on committee-forming and pedantic wording ring particularly true, and I fear that these things are what people are learning from each other. You don't need a committee or meeting for most decisions, and the wording seldom matters so long as the spirit is there for internal documents.
Make "speeches." Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your "points" by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate "patriotic" comments.
When training new workers, give incomplete or misleading instructions.
Do your work poorly and blame it on bad tools, machinery, or equipment. Complain that these things are preventing you from doing your job right.
I wonder how many of us reading this are nodding their heads and saying the same thing! Either there are too many spies in the workforce, or the agency needs to up it's tactics. Perhaps starting with "keep fiddling with your phone in meetings", "put Annoy-a-tron in your boss' room" etc.
Shit man, at this point I'm wondering if I'm not actually working for the CIA's industrial sabotage training department. That list is basically an SoP.
This is less of a how to sabotage and more like a list of productivity killing things they acknowledged were killing productivity and a suggestion that they can be applied in the context of sabotage.
11.a.5: "Haggle over precise wordings of communications..."
"productivity killing" is exactly what sabotage is, be it cutting railroad track or persuading telephone operators to randomly drop calls. You just said that sabotage is sabotage applied in the context of sabotage :)
[+] [-] cryoshon|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] elcct|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sigsergv|10 years ago|reply
Make "speeches." Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your "points" by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate "patriotic" comments.
When training new workers, give incomplete or misleading instructions.
Do your work poorly and blame it on bad tools, machinery, or equipment. Complain that these things are preventing you from doing your job right.
[+] [-] isoos|10 years ago|reply
I'm wondering how much it would take to invert every item, and turn the guide document into management best practices.
[+] [-] raverbashing|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chetanahuja|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cm2187|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vijayr|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] weland|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sigsergv|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rasur|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] paulus_magnus2|10 years ago|reply
http://www.simplesabotage.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ori...
[+] [-] dsfyu404ed|10 years ago|reply
While unsurprising, it's mildly amusing.
[+] [-] woodman|10 years ago|reply
"productivity killing" is exactly what sabotage is, be it cutting railroad track or persuading telephone operators to randomly drop calls. You just said that sabotage is sabotage applied in the context of sabotage :)
[+] [-] mring33621|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] violentvinyl|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] devonkim|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] signa11|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lsaferite|10 years ago|reply
> In 1944, CIA’s precursor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), created the Simple Sabotage Field Manual.
[+] [-] mariodiana|10 years ago|reply