From the FAQ: You may use the hovalin for commercial purposes if you agree to send 10% of your gross revenue from use of the design to HOVA LLC every six months.
It may be open source, but it's not open source as I've ever encountered it before.
(Also, I don't think I've ever heard someone claim that copyright law allows them to demand royalties on the use of a musical instrument. Is a musical performance a derivative work of the instrument design?)
Requested them to release the sources, not just the .STL.
Releasing just .STLs is more akin to freeware than open source, as the sources are the project files uses to produce the .STL (which is similar to a compiled binary).
It's not just you. No orchestral professional is going to want this over a wooden instrument. And given that, the pricing is just silly.
It's a good example of bad (naive) modelling. There's a lot more to making a violin (guitar/lute/anything...) than cutting out parts with the right shape and hammering them together.
Choice of wood, glue/joint mechanics, and thickness/composition of the varnish are at least as important.
I suspect it is hard to achieve the acoustics of an instrument traditionnaly made of wood with plastic.
Thinking of it, I don't remember hearing an instrument made out of plastic which sounded nice even though I'm a musician. I'm not saying it cannot be done, it is just not common for now.
To me the idea of printing my own violin would be to get a cheap yet decently functional Violin. The price point of $70 is 2x what it needs to be in my opinion. Going on ebay there are entry level violins for $40.
The fingerboard looks much shorter than on a standard violin. Maybe the materials can't support being cantilevered out over the body like a regular wooden fingerboard? If so, bummer... seems like it would have a pretty adverse effect on range, fingering options, etc.
Pretty cool achievement. The prices ($300, $450, $600) for the different kinds of kits make this seem like a poor investment if one is just looking for a violin.
[+] [-] cperciva|10 years ago|reply
It may be open source, but it's not open source as I've ever encountered it before.
(Also, I don't think I've ever heard someone claim that copyright law allows them to demand royalties on the use of a musical instrument. Is a musical performance a derivative work of the instrument design?)
[+] [-] naz|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jononor|10 years ago|reply
Releasing just .STLs is more akin to freeware than open source, as the sources are the project files uses to produce the .STL (which is similar to a compiled binary).
[+] [-] marcosscriven|10 years ago|reply
There's a repo on GitHub, but it looks old https://github.com/matthova/hovalin
[+] [-] leni536|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ant6n|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] netcan|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jeremiecoullon|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AlphaWeaver|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yummybear|10 years ago|reply
Nice technical achievement though.
[+] [-] TheOtherHobbes|10 years ago|reply
It's a good example of bad (naive) modelling. There's a lot more to making a violin (guitar/lute/anything...) than cutting out parts with the right shape and hammering them together.
Choice of wood, glue/joint mechanics, and thickness/composition of the varnish are at least as important.
[+] [-] louhike|10 years ago|reply
Thinking of it, I don't remember hearing an instrument made out of plastic which sounded nice even though I'm a musician. I'm not saying it cannot be done, it is just not common for now.
[+] [-] catshirt|10 years ago|reply
edit: now that i see the price... yeah you could say it sounds a little tinny
[+] [-] mentos|10 years ago|reply
Would be cool to see an open source piano
[+] [-] apendleton|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mattsouth|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eric-hu|10 years ago|reply