It seems most things sailing in the wake of twitter simply defy all logic and common sense. There have been literally dozens of picture sharing services before twitpic. The only difference I can see is the name ("look, we're for twitter!") and that he basically integrated an url-shortener.
The entire site looks like about a week's worth of work. 700k in annual profit? Not sure if I want to laugh or cry.
The entire site looks like about a week's worth of work. 700k in annual profit? Not sure if I want to laugh or cry.
Laugh. Be happy. Learn from this that you don't have to make something people want that nobody else could make because it's so complex and you're awesome. You just have to make something people want.
It's not so much what the site does but the fact that it came earlyish on and got so much traction (and recognition from most of the major Twitter clients). Being in the right place at the right time can beat execution in most areas.
Noah, thanks for putting all this info out there. And congratulations on your success so far.
Question: How did you respond to the leaked Twitter notes in which the Twitter guys talked about "blessing" another Twitter photosharing application instead of you? That had to be a low point. I remember when I first read that I clucked my tongue in sympathy for you. Do you suppose the Twitter guys would rather just work with a known quantity instead of some guy out in SC?
There were a few times in this interview that my BS detectors went off. Andrew asked a question regarding which VCs Noah had spoken with and Noah said he couldn't respond due to NDA. After some probing the story changed to say that only some of the VCs required NDA at the point of discussing monetary figures. Andrew did a nice job by continuing to ask questions like "what did they want you to do with the money?" and Noah again vacillated. It just struck me as odd that he couldn't remember what the discussions were about, it seems like something that should be really easy to remember. Of course, he could have just been nervous as well, but it really smelled fishy to me.
Disclaimer: I don't know Noah, I have never used TwitPic, I have nothing for or against Noah and / or TwitPic, so take all of this with an ENORMOUS grain of salt since this is nothing more than pure speculation
I would have sold, at any time twitter could basically undermine his business, actually the more successful it becomes the more likely twitter would be to integrate it.
Twitter is almost guaranteed not to go into photo sharing. They've had tons of opportunity to add in media services but they clearly aren't interested.
You said that currently you have $1.5M+ revenues, and margins of 70%. What are the current cost breakdowns right now? Other than salary, what other ongoing costs do you have?
2010 turns out to start full of good news about small teams. First Balsamiq story, now this one. Anticipated is a new wave of optimistic first-time entrepreneurs with financial projections built on these cases :)
[+] [-] moe|16 years ago|reply
It seems most things sailing in the wake of twitter simply defy all logic and common sense. There have been literally dozens of picture sharing services before twitpic. The only difference I can see is the name ("look, we're for twitter!") and that he basically integrated an url-shortener.
The entire site looks like about a week's worth of work. 700k in annual profit? Not sure if I want to laugh or cry.
[+] [-] abstractbill|16 years ago|reply
Laugh. Be happy. Learn from this that you don't have to make something people want that nobody else could make because it's so complex and you're awesome. You just have to make something people want.
[+] [-] petercooper|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] volida|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeyur|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tennisman120|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noaheverett|16 years ago|reply
Feel free to hit me up on Twitter (@noaheverett) if you have any questions.
[+] [-] brandnewlow|16 years ago|reply
Question: How did you respond to the leaked Twitter notes in which the Twitter guys talked about "blessing" another Twitter photosharing application instead of you? That had to be a low point. I remember when I first read that I clucked my tongue in sympathy for you. Do you suppose the Twitter guys would rather just work with a known quantity instead of some guy out in SC?
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/16/twitters-internal-strat... (ctrl+F for "twitpic" to find the relevant section)
[+] [-] Skeuomorph|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fizx|16 years ago|reply
Bullshit.
[+] [-] icey|16 years ago|reply
Disclaimer: I don't know Noah, I have never used TwitPic, I have nothing for or against Noah and / or TwitPic, so take all of this with an ENORMOUS grain of salt since this is nothing more than pure speculation
[+] [-] noaheverett|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AndrewWarner|16 years ago|reply
I was doing an interview and didn't see your comment till now.
[+] [-] mikeryan|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antidaily|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sucuri2|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jasonlbaptiste|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] robryan|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jfarmer|16 years ago|reply
This is what happens when your business is a commodity (and you're not the one who commoditized it).
[+] [-] gsmaverick|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anApple|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anApple|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slig|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|16 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tennisman120|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dusklight|16 years ago|reply
You said that currently you have $1.5M+ revenues, and margins of 70%. What are the current cost breakdowns right now? Other than salary, what other ongoing costs do you have?
[+] [-] ynniv|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sewerhorse|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alexro|16 years ago|reply