You can hop directly to the original mailing list post here: http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2010/01/04/8 (the entire thread is a good read for anyone curious about file system benchmarking).
I wish they'd give us some idea of how they are testing beyond mentioning "customer workload"; maybe even release their own benchmark by simulating some typical customer workload. The dbench bashing seems out of place without some further explanation.
"It was not until we moved from benchmarks to customer workload that we were able to make detailed performance comparisons and find bugs in our implementation."
So true. I don't know how many times I've been frustrated by people (ab)using benchmarks. The only real benchmark is your actual load. The closer you can approximate that, the better. And no, Dhrystone is nothing like your actual load.
Note that Chris Mason used to work on reiserfs, which means he has real-world experience working on actual filesystems. That he is involved in ext4 bodes well (note the CC'ed list on the link that micktwomey posted).
[+] [-] micktwomey|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] metachris|16 years ago|reply
Why is that link pointing to google in first place??
[+] [-] bayleo|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kprobst|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sketerpot|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aidenn0|16 years ago|reply
So true. I don't know how many times I've been frustrated by people (ab)using benchmarks. The only real benchmark is your actual load. The closer you can approximate that, the better. And no, Dhrystone is nothing like your actual load.
[+] [-] delano|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] patrickgzill|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fragmede|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jhammerb|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tarkin2|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|16 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] surkii|16 years ago|reply