Seconding this recommendation - I'm planning on assigning this book in a college course on the Columbian Exchange next year. It's got the readability of a longform New Yorker article and the scholarly credibility of an academic book. Totally fascinating material that will up end much of what you learned in high school textbooks.
There was a great, long-form piece of journalism about this, which I read not that long ago, after saving it for a long time on Pocket, I tried to find it again but failed in my googling, but it was probably by the author of that book, ah found it this time:
This article underscores one of the most interesting points in the book, that was applicable throughout the Americas, but was most startling in regard to the Amazon basin. It was that there was really no "untouched", virginal wilderness in the New World. Even the Amazon ecosystem was stewarded by the people that lived there.
Following _1491_: home to millions of people, the jungle mostly consisting of fruit-bearing trees (the modern Amazonian tribes are living in overgrown orchards), and in possession of miraculous sanitation/fertilizer technology.
Everyone should know about terra preta. It turns out it wasn't a soil-enrichment technique, it was sanitation with a side effect of soil enrichment -- and could be very applicable in the developing world (and the developed world!) today. An experiment in Germany -- look up the paper "Terra Preta Sanitation" -- showed that a slightly modified method of terra-preta production can sanitize human waste to well within First World standards.
Terra preta is formed naturally by falling fruits, leaves and branches that get composted on the soil. There's a agriculture method called agroforestry that make use of this concept, it's very promising for organic farms: https://vimeo.com/146953911
I know a couple of people here who have "dry bathrooms" (or banheiro seco) that is just a bucket to collect the poo, when you poo you cover it with dry leaves or grinded wood (they are the source of carbon, and stop the bad smell), when the bucket fills up they take it to an area outside far from the house where it will compost, naturally kill the pathogens (because of the heat it produces) and became terra-preta, much better solution than to send it down stream, easier to decentralize and the end result is the best product you could have.
There is also good evidence that there were extensive agricultural urban civilizations around and along the Mississippi. But they were so thoroughly destroyed (by the Little Ice Age, drought, and disease) that by the time European settlers got to those territories, even the descendant peoples had no memory of them. Only a handful of early explorers recorded them, and the principal archaeological traces are earth mounds (some rather large) built in their cities. For quite some time the "Mound Builders" were thought to be a different people entirely from the present native peoples.
DNA Search for the First Americans Links Amazon Groups to Indigenous Australians.
a researcher in Reich’s lab, noticed that the Suruí and Karitiana people of the Amazon had stronger ties to indigenous groups in Australasia—Australians, New Guineans and Andaman Islanders—than to Eurasians."
I wonder how much was lost by the Amazon peoples by the invasions of the Clovis peoples from Siberia.
While it's probably in the millions, all projected numbers are extremely rough and work by calculating the percentage likely to have die died in the disease that swept the continent. DO NOT VIEW THEM AS PRECISE OR ACCURATE.
However, the evidence seems pretty convincing that the vast majority of the indigenous people died in the centuries following spanish contact.
Supposedly when Europeans (the later arrivals not Vikings) showed up and disease spread killing many First Nations/Native Americans it caused a dramatic environmental shift.
As forests took over the former areas where the first peoples of the Americas lived trees sucked up a lot of CO2 causing the mini ice age in Europe.
Interesting if true, yet of course very sad as well but if true that pretty incredible to think of such a connection.
When I think about the Amazon rainforest and those who have called it home in the past 500 years - especially as we learn that they were more advanced than we had supposed - I think back to Terence McKenna's dying hope to save the plant medicines that are being forgotten and eradicated with deforestation.
We have no idea what manner of spiritually relevant plants are falling into obscurity cum annihilation, and given the resurgent interest in (and power of) ayahuasca, it's worth taking action to document and remember them.
With a little digging you can trace back the development of the consenus surrounding this issue over the past 25 years or so, which would probably be worth an article on its own.
Basically malaria was unknown in the Americas before western explorers brought it over. From there it became very prevalent in some places such as the Amazon and essentially made mass agriculture impossible there. Then pretty much everyone starved. There were also things like smallpox that devastated people everywhere in the Americas but those were more a one time thing, people were able to rebuild after they passed.
I don't get that at all. I got the "how presumptuous of Europeans to think that they brought civilization to the area, it was already there and if anything they may have set back the pace of progress."
The definition "destroy a large number of" has been around for centuries. You're contradicting long established usage, while pretending to appeal to it.
Are you wishing that the current usage of the word (the title you linked to) would stop, and that usage would revert to the older Latin meaning? Unfortunately that's not how language develops.
I wonder if any of this can be used to answer the objections to Biblical stories like Noah's flood: "how did the rainforest come about in a mere 4000 years?" And here we read that the forests were domesticated in the last 3000.
Many ancient cultures have myths about a great flood or series of floods. It was probably not a single global event, but plausibly to have been based in some shift in climate patterns during protohistoric times.
[+] [-] davidw|10 years ago|reply
http://amzn.to/1HQYgSY
[+] [-] benbreen|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ZeroGravitas|10 years ago|reply
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2002/03/1491/302...
[+] [-] haroldp|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] clock_tower|10 years ago|reply
Everyone should know about terra preta. It turns out it wasn't a soil-enrichment technique, it was sanitation with a side effect of soil enrichment -- and could be very applicable in the developing world (and the developed world!) today. An experiment in Germany -- look up the paper "Terra Preta Sanitation" -- showed that a slightly modified method of terra-preta production can sanitize human waste to well within First World standards.
[+] [-] alisson|10 years ago|reply
I know a couple of people here who have "dry bathrooms" (or banheiro seco) that is just a bucket to collect the poo, when you poo you cover it with dry leaves or grinded wood (they are the source of carbon, and stop the bad smell), when the bucket fills up they take it to an area outside far from the house where it will compost, naturally kill the pathogens (because of the heat it produces) and became terra-preta, much better solution than to send it down stream, easier to decentralize and the end result is the best product you could have.
[+] [-] rpgmaker|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jccooper|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tosseraccount|10 years ago|reply
"Here, we review the evidence of an anthropogenic Amazonia"
[+] [-] tosseraccount|10 years ago|reply
DNA Search for the First Americans Links Amazon Groups to Indigenous Australians. a researcher in Reich’s lab, noticed that the Suruí and Karitiana people of the Amazon had stronger ties to indigenous groups in Australasia—Australians, New Guineans and Andaman Islanders—than to Eurasians."
I wonder how much was lost by the Amazon peoples by the invasions of the Clovis peoples from Siberia.
[+] [-] duaneb|10 years ago|reply
However, the evidence seems pretty convincing that the vast majority of the indigenous people died in the centuries following spanish contact.
[+] [-] dghughes|10 years ago|reply
As forests took over the former areas where the first peoples of the Americas lived trees sucked up a lot of CO2 causing the mini ice age in Europe.
Interesting if true, yet of course very sad as well but if true that pretty incredible to think of such a connection.
[+] [-] wusher|10 years ago|reply
> "cold summers and ice growth began abruptly between 1275 and 1300, followed by "a substantial intensification" from 1430 to 1455"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age#Dating
[+] [-] hcarvalhoalves|10 years ago|reply
If you want to account for CO2, should consider native americans (north to south) used the slash-and-burn technique.
[+] [-] facepalm|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jMyles|10 years ago|reply
We have no idea what manner of spiritually relevant plants are falling into obscurity cum annihilation, and given the resurgent interest in (and power of) ayahuasca, it's worth taking action to document and remember them.
[+] [-] redwood|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gp7|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dang|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] patrickfl|10 years ago|reply
Anyway, so did the natives breed with the Europeans when they "wiped them out" or did the native people migrate to another part of the continent?
[+] [-] Symmetry|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] CapitalistCartr|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] meira|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] LordKano|10 years ago|reply
I was thinking about an initiative to publish books on recycled paper or something, then I finished reading the sentence.
[+] [-] cowardlydragon|10 years ago|reply
I think it's the "pristine myth" language. Just reeks of let-us-clear-cut-it mentality.
[+] [-] CPLX|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hanniabu|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikebelanger|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adamkochanowicz|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rogerbinns|10 years ago|reply
The 1491 book put the death rates at around 1 in 20 surviving - ie 19 out of every 20 people dying from disease etc.
[+] [-] dang|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] graeme|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MDCore|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coldtea|10 years ago|reply
In fact most Greek and Latin words have been altered a lot in meaning post adoption.
[+] [-] kansface|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] meira|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fatpeopleh8|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] EGreg|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] crpatino|10 years ago|reply