Julia also requires subsets of the language. Try writing rolled array expressions (in a loop or otherwise) in Julia and in Numba and see which one is faster.
Also try IO or text processing in Julia. Python is known to be faster right now.
> Also try IO or text processing in Julia. Python is known to be faster right now.
Back when I used Python (early 2000's), that was actually C code, if I remember correctly.
The question is with IO and text processing implemented in pure Julia and pure Python, except for the OS FFI, which JIT compiler provides the best implementation?
User defined types/classes are currently being worked on in an open PR. Excellent counterpoint for the time being, though.
Aside- Do you know if multiple inheritance/traits will happen at some point? I need this for modeling, even though it can be worked around for general software architecture.
pjmlp|10 years ago
Back when I used Python (early 2000's), that was actually C code, if I remember correctly.
The question is with IO and text processing implemented in pure Julia and pure Python, except for the OS FFI, which JIT compiler provides the best implementation?
tavert|10 years ago
Nrpf|10 years ago
Aside- Do you know if multiple inheritance/traits will happen at some point? I need this for modeling, even though it can be worked around for general software architecture.