Trial by combat was only abolished in England in 1819, after the much-publicized case of Ashford v Thornton in which the defendant successfully called for it. (No combat took place - the plaintiff withdrew rather than fight the much larger defendant.)
Could not a man with a familiar dog, perhaps a hunting animal, the property of a rival, cause it to rise against a particular person at a signal? I suspect the 'friend' of manufacturing the entire event, being the murderer himself. We have only his word on the history of the dog. He may have assumed its ownership upon the killing of the real owner; he was aware of the curious tradition of combat; he contrived a cute storey of animal loyalty to cover his vile act and misdirect attention onto another for the crime.
Depends on the dog. And the man. And the cudgel. Kidding aside, dogs weren't bred to be gentle house pets back then. Think something closer to a domesticated wolf.
I don't think it's even close. 9 times out of 10, a man with a cudgel should be destroyed by a large dog (especially one much closer to its wolf ancestry).
Even now, watching my very gentle Golden Retriever have an exuberant running fit, it's clear that dogs are much more agile than humans. All it takes is one miss of that cudgel, and teeth are locked in on the human's delicate skin, cutting in with hundreds of pounds of pressure.
[+] [-] alricb|10 years ago|reply
Judiciary combat probably wasn't that common in the late 1300s, although it still existed.
[+] [-] magerleagues|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrepd|10 years ago|reply
I think it's fine the way it is: clean, light and straightforward
[+] [-] sydneysider|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bbanyc|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] im1983|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] swayvil|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] malkia|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coupdejarnac|10 years ago|reply
This famous duel subverted the will of the King of France, helping to bring about the end of judicial combat:
http://www.thearma.org/essays/DOTC.htm#.VrZbiHNMHqA
[+] [-] JoeAltmaier|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dfc|10 years ago|reply
The the name of the name of the "popular melodrama" that was based on this story?
[+] [-] iambateman|10 years ago|reply
Shouldn't a man with a cudgel be able to beat a dog in a duel?
[+] [-] sp332|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] charlieflowers|10 years ago|reply
Even now, watching my very gentle Golden Retriever have an exuberant running fit, it's clear that dogs are much more agile than humans. All it takes is one miss of that cudgel, and teeth are locked in on the human's delicate skin, cutting in with hundreds of pounds of pressure.
[+] [-] travmatt|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dawnbreez|10 years ago|reply
However, the man has better reach in this case, and is (probably) trained better than the dog.
It's kind of a toss-up.
[+] [-] goetia303|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BWStearns|10 years ago|reply
* I had to read the French wikipedia Judicial Combat section on the Dueling page in order to find that word.
[+] [-] tsuru|10 years ago|reply