top | item 11047548

Judicial combat between a man and a dog in 1361

113 points| networked | 10 years ago |thebookofdays.com | reply

28 comments

order
[+] alricb|10 years ago|reply
That never actually happened; it's a legend that was already found in songs from the 1100s. The 1361 or 71 date is from an invented marginal comment in an edition of Montaigne's works: http://gatinais.histoire.pagesperso-orange.fr/Chien_de_Monta...

Judiciary combat probably wasn't that common in the late 1300s, although it still existed.

[+] magerleagues|10 years ago|reply
I would buy a printed book of all these stories. I am also compelled to redesign their website for free.
[+] andrepd|10 years ago|reply
> I am also compelled to redesign their website for free.

I think it's fine the way it is: clean, light and straightforward

[+] sydneysider|10 years ago|reply
Count me in as well, it's such a nice feeling to actually find content worth reading these days.
[+] bbanyc|10 years ago|reply
Trial by combat was only abolished in England in 1819, after the much-publicized case of Ashford v Thornton in which the defendant successfully called for it. (No combat took place - the plaintiff withdrew rather than fight the much larger defendant.)
[+] swayvil|10 years ago|reply
This is fantastic. We need to do things this way more often.
[+] JoeAltmaier|10 years ago|reply
Could not a man with a familiar dog, perhaps a hunting animal, the property of a rival, cause it to rise against a particular person at a signal? I suspect the 'friend' of manufacturing the entire event, being the murderer himself. We have only his word on the history of the dog. He may have assumed its ownership upon the killing of the real owner; he was aware of the curious tradition of combat; he contrived a cute storey of animal loyalty to cover his vile act and misdirect attention onto another for the crime.
[+] dfc|10 years ago|reply
Does anyone know: If there are any pictures of "the chimney in the great hall of the chateau of Montargis"?

The the name of the name of the "popular melodrama" that was based on this story?

[+] iambateman|10 years ago|reply
Making a murderer season 2?

Shouldn't a man with a cudgel be able to beat a dog in a duel?

[+] sp332|10 years ago|reply
Depends on the dog. And the man. And the cudgel. Kidding aside, dogs weren't bred to be gentle house pets back then. Think something closer to a domesticated wolf.
[+] charlieflowers|10 years ago|reply
I don't think it's even close. 9 times out of 10, a man with a cudgel should be destroyed by a large dog (especially one much closer to its wolf ancestry).

Even now, watching my very gentle Golden Retriever have an exuberant running fit, it's clear that dogs are much more agile than humans. All it takes is one miss of that cudgel, and teeth are locked in on the human's delicate skin, cutting in with hundreds of pounds of pressure.

[+] travmatt|10 years ago|reply
I think you may overestimate how strong people are.
[+] dawnbreez|10 years ago|reply
Dogs are both faster and better armed than men.

However, the man has better reach in this case, and is (probably) trained better than the dog.

It's kind of a toss-up.

[+] goetia303|10 years ago|reply
Air Bud 1361
[+] BWStearns|10 years ago|reply
Vainqueur Bud 1361

* I had to read the French wikipedia Judicial Combat section on the Dueling page in order to find that word.