Wow. The Greeks did well to invent runes that hold six numbers in a tiny square box. I can't imagine the precision hammers and chisels they would need for that.
to nitpick, I believe those used in Linear A are not technically "runes", i.e. the runes are only the ones used in writing systems for german languages, and derived from old italic alphabets.
Peirce reckoned that there are three basic signs: icons, indices (indexes?), and symbols. An icon looks like the thing it is representing. An index points to it (like your index finger does, this is called indexicality). A symbol stands in for and is unlike the thing it represents, like 4 for |||| things.
So because equality is represented with a scales you _should_ have said, "I guess it's nice when the signs have iconicity." :)
I hate to sound alarmist, but I'm seriously worried that we're reaching "peak novelty programming language". If we don't start exploring alternative uses of free time now, we're going to be in serious trouble soon.
It bothers me more that they all tend to be reskins of conventional imperative languages. It’s fun when it’s a joke, but a lot of non-joke languages are built the same way. We don’t need new syntax for the same semantics—we need new semantics.
[+] [-] J_Darnley|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jcadam|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] roywiggins|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] riffraff|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bmm6o|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xiaq|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] protomyth|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 0xdeadbeefbabe|10 years ago|reply
Looks like they didn't have the right unicode font for L
[+] [-] rbanffy|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] njharman|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] 0xdeadbeefbabe|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Toenex|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] ommunist|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] luckystarr|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] igravious|10 years ago|reply
Peirce reckoned that there are three basic signs: icons, indices (indexes?), and symbols. An icon looks like the thing it is representing. An index points to it (like your index finger does, this is called indexicality). A symbol stands in for and is unlike the thing it represents, like 4 for |||| things.
So because equality is represented with a scales you _should_ have said, "I guess it's nice when the signs have iconicity." :)
[+] [-] roywiggins|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] riebschlager|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] evincarofautumn|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dgabriel|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] roywiggins|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stuxnet79|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sbonilla|10 years ago|reply