top | item 11294572

(no title)

fieryeagle | 10 years ago

TL;DR cashless with anonymity and decentralisation. Sounds like Bitcoin.

discuss

order

matt_wulfeck|10 years ago

Bitcoin isn't anonymous. You pay someone and can look at every transaction they ever made.

mbil|10 years ago

BTC's supposed to be pseudoanonymous:

The traditional banking model achieves a level of privacy by limiting access to information to the parties involved and the trusted third party. The necessity to announce all transactions publicly precludes this method, but privacy can still be maintained by breaking the flow of information in another place: by keeping public keys anonymous. The public can see that someone is sending an amount to someone else, but without information linking the transaction to anyone. ... As an additional firewall, a new key pair should be used for each transaction to keep them from being linked to a common owner. Some linking is still unavoidable with multi-input transactions, which necessarily reveal that their inputs were owned by the same owner. The risk is that if the owner of a key is revealed, linking could reveal other transactions that belonged to the same owner

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

fieryeagle|10 years ago

Only if I publish my address and leave patterns behind. Agree that it's debatable then again, wouldn't you agree that in a relative sense, pseudo-anonymous is better than bank accounts tied to your name?

paulajohnson|10 years ago

The real point of Bitcoin isn't that its anonymous, its that the Government can't stop you using it or seize your money.