I reject the significance of the question, and I reject the purported method used to answer it. First, defang it of the direction of causal fit problem. Does being in a state of greater educational attainment dispose one towards happiness? The answer? Irrelevant.
Let us say that it was not true in a concrete case: that Paris Hilton (or someone equivalent) was happier than, say, W.V.O. Quine. Would that mean that the late Professor Quine should have dropped all that logic lark, caught the next plane to Hollywood and started snorting coke and appearing in sex tapes? Of course not.
If the only goal we had in life was happiness, we would spend all day watching TV, popping Prozac and engaging in mindless consumerist 'retail therapy' to cover up for our lack of... oh, wait.
Penelope Trunk has written a bunch of articles on people who are interested in happiness vs living an interesting life. I can't speak to the validity of her sources, but it's something interesting to think about:
I love how, as "Correlation does not prove causation" becomes more and more well-known, it is frequently added on to the end of an article with the basic approach of: "Correlation is not causation, but gosh, isn't it tempting?!"
Here's my reverse causality analysis: perhaps it's that those predispositionally disposed towards happiness -- optimistic, for example -- tend to go to college more often (and finish) than unhappy people.
A variety of studies that I have read suggest that the causation is that wealthier people (of a given level of ability) go to and complete college much more than poor people.
[+] [-] tommorris|16 years ago|reply
Let us say that it was not true in a concrete case: that Paris Hilton (or someone equivalent) was happier than, say, W.V.O. Quine. Would that mean that the late Professor Quine should have dropped all that logic lark, caught the next plane to Hollywood and started snorting coke and appearing in sex tapes? Of course not.
If the only goal we had in life was happiness, we would spend all day watching TV, popping Prozac and engaging in mindless consumerist 'retail therapy' to cover up for our lack of... oh, wait.
[+] [-] JeffJenkins|16 years ago|reply
http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2010/01/14/do-you-overemphasiz...
[+] [-] mcantor|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tokenadult|16 years ago|reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_caus...
[+] [-] bwh2|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jseliger|16 years ago|reply
And once I have enough education, I can read books like Daniel Gilbert's Stumbling on Happiness: http://jseliger.com/2009/04/23/stumbling-on-happiness-daniel... and hopefully (re?)learn about happiness.
[+] [-] msluyter|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tokenadult|16 years ago|reply
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_27/b3840045_...
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ffp0621.pdf
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ff0615S.pdf
http://www.tcf.org/Publications/Education/carnrose.pdf
http://www.tcf.org/Publications/Education/kahlenberg-affacti...
http://harvardmagazine.com/2005/05/a-thumb-on-the-scale.html
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200511/financial-aid-leveragi...
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=510012
http://www.equaleducation.org/commentary.asp?opedid=1240
http://www.jkcf.org/assets/files/0000/0084/Achievement_Trap....
http://www.reason.com/news/show/123910.html
And most other things being equal, it's easier to be happy as a rich person than as a poor person.
[+] [-] vinhboy|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pavs|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] harshpotatoes|16 years ago|reply
data is roughly elliptical, R^2 is .464 hmmm...
after reading I'm still left wondering, is there a correlation between education and happiness?
[+] [-] mattiss|16 years ago|reply