[Htsthbjig]

I disagree.

I also had been following VR closely. Studying what happened to photography cinema or radio we can predict VR as the new media having a great success over time. Today VR lacks media designed for VR.

Right now, VR is opening to thousands or tens of thousands of people, probably millions, including creative, smart developers and artists. Before, patents made VR limited to a handful of people.

Artist will adapt to VR limitations like they did to cinema. Someone had to invent travelings, or cuts, and blendings. At first, cinema was just theater.

Do you know that if you record video without motion stabilization for some time people experience nausea and disconfort?

That is the reason virtually every film uses steady cams or rails or tripods with panning on each axis.

That you can't replace reality totally with VR does not mean that VR is not useful with their limitations.

We had been using VR in our company for CAD for a long time now, and for this application is extremely useful, better than anything else.

No doubt they will discover great new applications for VR even within their limitations. Artist will learn how to minimize their drawbacks just like they do in radio, cinema, or TV.