top | item 11434147 (no title) janinge | 10 years ago It is not, or was not? Did this issue get rectified by Telegram? discuss order hn newest CiPHPerCoder|10 years ago No, they still use MTProto and not an AEAD construction. janinge|10 years ago I was referring to the padding attack. Did they patch this?And are there any property of MTProto that makes it infeasible to replace AES IGE in a later revision of the protocol? load replies (1)
CiPHPerCoder|10 years ago No, they still use MTProto and not an AEAD construction. janinge|10 years ago I was referring to the padding attack. Did they patch this?And are there any property of MTProto that makes it infeasible to replace AES IGE in a later revision of the protocol? load replies (1)
janinge|10 years ago I was referring to the padding attack. Did they patch this?And are there any property of MTProto that makes it infeasible to replace AES IGE in a later revision of the protocol? load replies (1)
CiPHPerCoder|10 years ago
janinge|10 years ago
And are there any property of MTProto that makes it infeasible to replace AES IGE in a later revision of the protocol?