Here is a fun fact. Apple and Inspur are both UNIX vendors.
It is not news that Apple has given up on Mac OS X as a UNIX server platform, but seeing one UNIX vendor outsource to another UNIX vendor at this level is still weird.
> It is not news that Apple has given up on Mac OS X as a UNIX server platform.
Indeed. Having wasted many a weekend trying to get OS X Server working with portable homes, MCX preferences or the so called Golden Triangle of Active Directory and Open Directory I was left with the distinct impression that OS X Server is most definitely the most neglected product in the Apple stable.
I guess Steve Jobs' famous mantra, to say 'no' to a hundred things so Apple can say 'yes' to the one is very much apparent in this case. It's admirable in a way - that unlike Microsoft, Apple won't dogfood their server product if there's something which better meets their needs already out there.
>It is not news that Apple has given up on Mac OS X as a UNIX server platform, but seeing one UNIX vendor outsource to another UNIX vendor at this level is still weird.
I'm tagging on to this, not being from the US or china, I can't see how one is worse than the other. The idea that china is a bad guy while the us is a good guy doesn't really make sense to me, they both does what is in the best interest of themselves.
Some people think some countries shouldn't handle their information at all. They really shouldn't store their data in the cloud if they're concerned about state sponsored spying though.
[+] [-] gsiener|10 years ago|reply
http://www.crn.com/news/cloud/300080062/cloud-makes-for-stra...
[+] [-] Scarbutt|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rb808|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] innocentoldguy|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ryao|10 years ago|reply
It is not news that Apple has given up on Mac OS X as a UNIX server platform, but seeing one UNIX vendor outsource to another UNIX vendor at this level is still weird.
[+] [-] leonroy|10 years ago|reply
Indeed. Having wasted many a weekend trying to get OS X Server working with portable homes, MCX preferences or the so called Golden Triangle of Active Directory and Open Directory I was left with the distinct impression that OS X Server is most definitely the most neglected product in the Apple stable.
I guess Steve Jobs' famous mantra, to say 'no' to a hundred things so Apple can say 'yes' to the one is very much apparent in this case. It's admirable in a way - that unlike Microsoft, Apple won't dogfood their server product if there's something which better meets their needs already out there.
[+] [-] doener|10 years ago|reply
Had Apple ever used OS X for iCloud?
[+] [-] nodesocket|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Learn2win|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] T-Winsnes|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zxcvcxz|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] exabrial|10 years ago|reply
I'm curious, why isn't apple producing their own servers? They had XServe back in the good old days...
[+] [-] dcip6s|10 years ago|reply