top | item 1158807

Pick one and own it

56 points| terrellm | 16 years ago |blog.asmartbear.com | reply

24 comments

order
[+] staunch|16 years ago|reply
Made me think of Google. They used to make a big deal out of having the largest index. They don't do that anymore. Maybe it's a good idea to transition from pushing One Thing at some point, lest you leave the opportunity for someone to outshine you on that One Thing.
[+] nagrom|16 years ago|reply
That point only applies if you think of Google as a 'search' company. I would argue that Google is an internet services company (that is funded by advertising rather than subscriptions) that 'owns' search. Arguments can be made on whose office suites are better, whose maps systems are better, whose social networks are better and whose phone OS is better, but Google has picked search and, boy! Do they own it.
[+] stuff4ben|16 years ago|reply
well that answers a lot of questions for me as a budding entrepreneur. But the one question that I've never found answers to is how you get customers? How do you go out and find people who want to buy what you build?
[+] dpcan|16 years ago|reply
... edit, snarky remarks removed, unnecessary ...

Here are a few ideas:

You have to talk to people

Network

Go out in the world and leave your computer to actually generate interest by talking up your product

Join the chamber of commerce, go to the events, get local interest.

Do some broad marketing with twitter, the radio, tv, local ads, signs, flyers, send out direct mail.

Narrow marketing, cold calling, PPC ads, setup meetings with people you "think" might have interest.

Pick up the phone, call a company you "think" might want your product - if they don't they may even tell you who does.

Call all your friends, their friends, their parents, their cousins and neighbors.

Think outside the box. Go viral with a video, a strange campaign, a giveaway, advertise on podcasts, or on blogs.

Email bloggers to review your product.

Ask your tweet followers to help you spread the word with a hash tag.

Create a page in Facebook, blab about it a little and have your friends help spread the word.

Go to info-sites in your niche and pay them to advertise.

Join some forums, be a voice, make some friends, and try hard to be a part of the conversation - not a spammer.

Post a beta/try me link to HN, Reddit, BoS, KillerStartups

----------

Or, you could put up a website and cross your fingers. (I'd cross your toes too if you're going this route)

[+] terrellm|16 years ago|reply
Pick up the phone and call potential customers or even better you could meet with them in person.

Cold calling / meeting is tough in the beginning if you are introverted like I once was, but in my case the motivation to pick up the phone was knowing I would be able to put food on the table and pay the rent.

[+] nkabbara|16 years ago|reply
My way of doing it was to actually start a business in the domain. Grasshopper invited me to write a little about my story. I hope you find it somewhat helpful: http://bit.ly/bM4mp4

Let me know if you need help with anything.

[+] SlyShy|16 years ago|reply
Just develop an eye for observation. It's very difficult for me to go through an entire day without noticing a new opportunity for a start-up. There are some very obvious behaviours you can look for to identify opportunity.

Any time you see someone swearing at a product, make note. That product sucks, whoever is using it wishes they could switch to an alternative. There's an idea. Sometimes it won't be as obvious as swearing. Sometimes it is just "it's so annoying that I have to submit all my material to colleges. There should just be an API for college admissions."

People talk about what they want constantly, you just have to tune in to hear it.

[+] nkohari|16 years ago|reply
> There's a myth that "more features are always more complex," but that's just bad user interface design.

It's true that you can have a bad user experience with less features, but it's much more difficult to create a good user experience with a complex piece of software. I like what he says about hiding features that aren't in use, but in reality, every feature that you add to the product increases its complexity and cost, and makes it that much harder to create a satisfying user experience.

[+] JoeAltmaier|16 years ago|reply
Its a good drill to go thru - even if you have more than one advantage, practice pitching each one in isolation.
[+] DTrejo|16 years ago|reply
This is a kickass article. I see things more clearly now.
[+] scotty79|16 years ago|reply
> Open-source is free like puppies are free. You don't write a check to get it, but you have to support it for life. Your employee's time is not free. Working around bugs is not free. Having nothing but the Web of Lies Internet to rely on for tech support is not free.

Nice piece of FUD.

[+] smartbear|16 years ago|reply
Depends on the open-source project. For e.g. Apache, Linux, MySQL, you're right it's unfair. For things like RoR, it's pretty accurate. For small projects, it's definitely true, but then again most companies don't depend on relatively unknown OSS projects.
[+] pchristensen|16 years ago|reply
Are you serious? He's role-playing the sales-pitch you would give if your positioning was 'most expensive'. It's supposed to be FUD - it's an illustrative pretend marketing campaign!
[+] mseebach|16 years ago|reply
It's only FUD when comparing with a similar non-open-source piece of software - i.e. Postgres vs. MSSQL, Apache vs. IIS, OpenOffice vs. MS Office.

A standard shrink-wrapped version of the for-money options doesn't come with any kind of support that the open source versions don't have.

But when comparing e.g. GitHub with Git+Linux+SSH+Nginx+Python+Trac+.... it's completely fair. And that's one of the easy setups.