- 3 species of spider, a centipede, 4 species of isopod (the group that includes woodlice), a leech never seen anywhere else in the world, and an unusual-looking insect called a waterscorpion
- Movile's only snail [probably the only snail species] suggested that it has been down there for just over 2 million years.
- Many animals are born without eyes, which would be useless in the dark. Almost all are translucent as they have lost pigment in their skin.
- The cave seems to have no contact with the surface; Chernobyl accident had released lots of radioactive metals, which had found their way into the soils and lakes surrounding Movile Cave. However, a 1996 study found no traces of them inside the cave.
- The ecosystem seems to be supported by chemosynthesis; bacteria oxidise methane, sulphide and ammonia, generating energy and organic matter.
The sad irony is that by opening it and discovered it, we've ruined the entire ecosystem. But by not discovering it we never would have known about it, and it is an educational opportunity lost.
Really cannot win either way. Just have to hope there are other, undiscovered, caves like this around the globe.
The part about "The bacteria's ability to oxidise methane and carbon dioxide is of particular interest." -- which seems to mean "ability to oxidise carbon dioxide" -- can't be right. Maybe the meaning is methane to CO2?
How can you still extract energy from a O=C=O molecule without using something like flourine? On the other hand, how does the CO2 get back into the carbon cycle? Do the organisms use an endothermic process to get the carbon back?
And has the 10% oxygen content been there since the cave was opened? Or was this the first mass extinction? While the water does not reach the cave, is there a way for air to make it through? I would expect no oxygen otherwise.
>The cave is called "Movile"
I don't know if I would call this an interesting takeaway lol, more like just a fact you need to know when talking about this.
And it's just a tad bit more expensive to get to the moon than this cave, and by tad, I mean it's probably more expensive than any other activity a single human being has ever done, so I'm not sure why they use this comparison.
I would like to know this too! I'm trying to think it must be some radioisotope dating, but I don't see what they would be comparing or sampling. It would also be interesting to do some DNA dating differential method between species.
Resilience is probably not that closely linked to the probability of arising. Maybe once it exists, it is resilient, but when it is absent, chances of it arising are still very low.
Both HN and BBC titles are rather clickbaity. Pity for what turns out to be an interesting article on non-photosynthesis-based food webs, communities, and metabolism.
Probably not, because their situation has been stable for 5,5 million years. You wouldn't expect them to go extinct unless something changes (like a major collapse of the cave).
What I'm reading is that the cave is like a 5-million year old micro brewing process, and as with many microbrews there are some nightmarish scorpions and spiders and scary creatures associated with the cave's brand. If that allegory is correct, then by exploring that cave we have essentially opened the cork and stuck our finger in, haven't we?
[+] [-] tomp|10 years ago|reply
- The cave is called "Movile".
- 3 species of spider, a centipede, 4 species of isopod (the group that includes woodlice), a leech never seen anywhere else in the world, and an unusual-looking insect called a waterscorpion
- Movile's only snail [probably the only snail species] suggested that it has been down there for just over 2 million years.
- Many animals are born without eyes, which would be useless in the dark. Almost all are translucent as they have lost pigment in their skin.
- The cave seems to have no contact with the surface; Chernobyl accident had released lots of radioactive metals, which had found their way into the soils and lakes surrounding Movile Cave. However, a 1996 study found no traces of them inside the cave.
- The ecosystem seems to be supported by chemosynthesis; bacteria oxidise methane, sulphide and ammonia, generating energy and organic matter.
[+] [-] Someone1234|10 years ago|reply
Really cannot win either way. Just have to hope there are other, undiscovered, caves like this around the globe.
[+] [-] zeotroph|10 years ago|reply
How can you still extract energy from a O=C=O molecule without using something like flourine? On the other hand, how does the CO2 get back into the carbon cycle? Do the organisms use an endothermic process to get the carbon back?
And has the 10% oxygen content been there since the cave was opened? Or was this the first mass extinction? While the water does not reach the cave, is there a way for air to make it through? I would expect no oxygen otherwise.
[+] [-] nefitty|10 years ago|reply
http://apassionforscience.pbworks.com/f/1364093168/foodv.jpg
[+] [-] mtarnovan|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] samirm|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ucaetano|10 years ago|reply
Is this supposed to be terrifying? Anyone who woke up at night and walked to the bathroom faced pitch darkness and temperatures of 25 °C!
[+] [-] ygra|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] qaq|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pvg|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fma|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jgrahamc|10 years ago|reply
BBC reporting is really kind of crappy. 12 people walked on the Moon; 22 people orbited the Moon.
[+] [-] nkrisc|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] arbuge|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] octagonal|10 years ago|reply
100 people: 0.00000134736% of the earth's population
Seems fairly comparable to me.
[+] [-] bonzini|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] webXL|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] raldi|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mh-cx|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joemi|10 years ago|reply
That said, I suspect it's based on the location and composition of the cave and it's surroundings.
[+] [-] beefok|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] carlesfe|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] txutxu|10 years ago|reply
> are. It's not at all obvious why that should be, or how
> the animals survive at all.
Mmmm I think it's the opposite: On more animals using the same static air balloons, less Oxygen will be there.
[+] [-] Normal_gaussian|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dc2|10 years ago|reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tOghHmhQKI
It gets more interesting starting on the third video.
[+] [-] amasad|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Evgeny|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] startling|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dredmorbius|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] _asummers|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amorphid|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] samstave|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Scarblac|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ommunist|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] csours|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pavel_lishin|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] x2398dh1|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] CodinM|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sengork|10 years ago|reply
On another note an well hidden cave like that would be great for preserving man made historical artefacts.
[+] [-] ensiferum|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] censhin|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hinkley|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] OJFord|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hinkley|10 years ago|reply