top | item 11682816

A cave in Romania that was sealed for 5.5M years

889 points| ForFreedom | 10 years ago |bbc.com | reply

161 comments

order
[+] tomp|10 years ago|reply
Some interesting takeaways::

- The cave is called "Movile".

- 3 species of spider, a centipede, 4 species of isopod (the group that includes woodlice), a leech never seen anywhere else in the world, and an unusual-looking insect called a waterscorpion

- Movile's only snail [probably the only snail species] suggested that it has been down there for just over 2 million years.

- Many animals are born without eyes, which would be useless in the dark. Almost all are translucent as they have lost pigment in their skin.

- The cave seems to have no contact with the surface; Chernobyl accident had released lots of radioactive metals, which had found their way into the soils and lakes surrounding Movile Cave. However, a 1996 study found no traces of them inside the cave.

- The ecosystem seems to be supported by chemosynthesis; bacteria oxidise methane, sulphide and ammonia, generating energy and organic matter.

[+] Someone1234|10 years ago|reply
The sad irony is that by opening it and discovered it, we've ruined the entire ecosystem. But by not discovering it we never would have known about it, and it is an educational opportunity lost.

Really cannot win either way. Just have to hope there are other, undiscovered, caves like this around the globe.

[+] zeotroph|10 years ago|reply
The part about "The bacteria's ability to oxidise methane and carbon dioxide is of particular interest." -- which seems to mean "ability to oxidise carbon dioxide" -- can't be right. Maybe the meaning is methane to CO2?

How can you still extract energy from a O=C=O molecule without using something like flourine? On the other hand, how does the CO2 get back into the carbon cycle? Do the organisms use an endothermic process to get the carbon back?

And has the 10% oxygen content been there since the cave was opened? Or was this the first mass extinction? While the water does not reach the cave, is there a way for air to make it through? I would expect no oxygen otherwise.

[+] mtarnovan|10 years ago|reply
Movila (plura: movile) means mound in romanian
[+] samirm|10 years ago|reply
>The cave is called "Movile" I don't know if I would call this an interesting takeaway lol, more like just a fact you need to know when talking about this.
[+] ucaetano|10 years ago|reply
"in pitch darkness and temperatures of 25 °C"

Is this supposed to be terrifying? Anyone who woke up at night and walked to the bathroom faced pitch darkness and temperatures of 25 °C!

[+] ygra|10 years ago|reply
The title is a bit misleading. The cave was discovered in 1986. It's just that this article is a bit more recent.
[+] qaq|10 years ago|reply
What's 30 years compared to 5.5M :)
[+] pvg|10 years ago|reply
That's because the title was made up by the poster and not the original.
[+] fma|10 years ago|reply
The OP probably saw this posted in the TIL subreddit. This article is 9 months old, posted on reddit 12 hours ago, posted on HN 7 hours ago.
[+] jgrahamc|10 years ago|reply
Fewer than 100 people have been allowed inside Movile, a number comparable to those who have been to the Moon.

BBC reporting is really kind of crappy. 12 people walked on the Moon; 22 people orbited the Moon.

[+] nkrisc|10 years ago|reply
12, 22, and the number of people who have been in the cave are all fewer than 100. Same order of magnitude.
[+] arbuge|10 years ago|reply
Technically 100 and 32 are comparable numbers.
[+] octagonal|10 years ago|reply
33 people: 0.00000045810% of the earth's population

100 people: 0.00000134736% of the earth's population

Seems fairly comparable to me.

[+] bonzini|10 years ago|reply
It was 29 in 2010. Sounds like it's much smaller than 100.
[+] webXL|10 years ago|reply
And it's just a tad bit more expensive to get to the moon than this cave, and by tad, I mean it's probably more expensive than any other activity a single human being has ever done, so I'm not sure why they use this comparison.
[+] raldi|10 years ago|reply
And two more went around the moon but never entered orbit.
[+] mh-cx|10 years ago|reply
Maybe I've missed it, but how exactly do they know it was cut off for 5.5M years?
[+] joemi|10 years ago|reply
Good question. I've read a bunch of articles about it (haven't delved into the research papers), and none of what I've read ever mentions that.

That said, I suspect it's based on the location and composition of the cave and it's surroundings.

[+] beefok|10 years ago|reply
I would like to know this too! I'm trying to think it must be some radioisotope dating, but I don't see what they would be comparing or sampling. It would also be interesting to do some DNA dating differential method between species.
[+] txutxu|10 years ago|reply
> Strangely, the worse the air gets the more animals there

> are. It's not at all obvious why that should be, or how

> the animals survive at all.

Mmmm I think it's the opposite: On more animals using the same static air balloons, less Oxygen will be there.

[+] amasad|10 years ago|reply
Goes to show how resilient life is. Which makes it all the more unlikely that life is all that rare.
[+] Evgeny|10 years ago|reply
Resilience is probably not that closely linked to the probability of arising. Maybe once it exists, it is resilient, but when it is absent, chances of it arising are still very low.
[+] startling|10 years ago|reply
This is like, textbook survivorship bias.
[+] dredmorbius|10 years ago|reply
Both HN and BBC titles are rather clickbaity. Pity for what turns out to be an interesting article on non-photosynthesis-based food webs, communities, and metabolism.
[+] _asummers|10 years ago|reply
I believe the protocol here is to not complain about the title without suggesting a better alternative for the mods.
[+] amorphid|10 years ago|reply
Are animals in a cave like this considered endangered species?
[+] samstave|10 years ago|reply
Well, they are now that we found them.
[+] Scarblac|10 years ago|reply
Probably not, because their situation has been stable for 5,5 million years. You wouldn't expect them to go extinct unless something changes (like a major collapse of the cave).
[+] ommunist|10 years ago|reply
This is fascinating. Life is everywhere. This is real "pitch black", just with smaller monsters.
[+] csours|10 years ago|reply
Perhaps the Andromeda Strain will be found in a cave, not in space...
[+] pavel_lishin|10 years ago|reply
You might like Peter Watts' Starfish.
[+] x2398dh1|10 years ago|reply
What I'm reading is that the cave is like a 5-million year old micro brewing process, and as with many microbrews there are some nightmarish scorpions and spiders and scary creatures associated with the cave's brand. If that allegory is correct, then by exploring that cave we have essentially opened the cork and stuck our finger in, haven't we?
[+] CodinM|10 years ago|reply
Holy shit my city is #1 on HackerNews.
[+] sengork|10 years ago|reply
Those creatures have evolved on their own tangent. Quite interesting to see how different they are compared to the creatures outside of the cave.

On another note an well hidden cave like that would be great for preserving man made historical artefacts.

[+] ensiferum|10 years ago|reply
... and then humans came along and filled it with coke bottles, plastic bags, old car tyres and other rubbish.
[+] censhin|10 years ago|reply
So in summary, life, ahh, finds a way.
[+] hinkley|10 years ago|reply
Cenozoic Park just doesn't have the same ring to it. Especially since all parks are technically Cenozoic Park.
[+] OJFord|10 years ago|reply

    > became roughly the 29th person to enter
Roughly?
[+] hinkley|10 years ago|reply
"We don't know for sure how many of his girlfriends Steve has snuck into the cave over the years, and frankly we're afraid to ask."