r/android seems unimpressed because many of the initially removable components are no longer removable (at least, as indicated by marketing videos) [1]. However, it seems silly to me to get upset about this because this is a Developer Edition and Google clearly had to limit the scope of the project in order to ship. Though, one wonders if there are physical limits causing the CPU, GPU, battery, and display to be non-removable. We'll see.
> because many of the initially removable components are no longer removable
It's not that "many" of the components aren't available, it's all the components anyone cared about. It seems like you won't be able to swap out the CPU, GPU, RAM, battery or screen. So if you want a phone with a faster CPU, you need to buy an entirely new phone, which goes against all the hype for these modular phone plans.
From the venturebeat article linked below: "The idea of Ara is to ensure that your devices are future-proofed, meaning that the whole “upgrade every two years” mentality is no longer a thing. ". This certainly isn't true. Though I guess it could be slightly cheaper, since you would be just buying a frame, and could pop in your old camera module.
There also aren't any modules being shown that can clue you into what the potential is. The only thing recognizable is a camera module, and what I'm guessing is a small e-ink display., every other module is just an unlabeled colored/textured rectangle. In every article about it the only example ever used is a camera.
The module idea actually seems really cool, a standard way for anyone to create hardware for your phone. But I think the "modular phone. Upgrade one bit a time. Never obsolete." marketing angle is a blatant lie.
Edit: I agree with one of the jokes in that Reddit thread about this
Here's what I want for my six modules:
1. Camera
2. Battery
3. Battery
4. Battery
5. Battery
6. Battery
I haven't read the Reddit comments (and I don't even own an Android phone) but... aren't those the things you would MOST want to upgrade in the future?
It seems to me that treating the frame containing these components as just another module is reasonable enough. That said, the battery is the number one item I want to be easily replaceable. Not only is it a big help to be able to carry spares, but Li-ion batteries degrade over time and put a limit on the useful life of a device even if its capabilities still suit the user.
That basically kills it for me. The only reason I was interested was to be able to transform a phone into a larger tablet just by swapping the screen module out.
Is there a crowd-sourced list with anti-adblocker websites? One could combine this with a Greasemonkey/Tampermonkey userscript for HN to add some warning icons right next to the submission link.
>They’re also building “style” modules, which don’t do anything except look nice.
This is underrated, at least in the article. People love customizing. They'll spend money on that. Wood, gold, ceramic, organic-whatever, glass-with-bits-of-Holy-Land, and on and on. Even for basic parts, like the camera, people will pay just to have different colored rings around the lens.
Phone cases are one obvious example of all this, but being able to replace the materials of different parts of the phone seems like the next step.
I'm not convinced this project has much use otherwise, though. Would love to be wrong. But even their demo video shows nothing useful at all.
Small companies can now develop phone modules and release products with more advanced technology in a specific area (battery tech, camera, etc) without designing the rest of the phone. It would ideally be compatible with any unipro phone. This is important because a lot of technologies that would normally make it into phones doesn't because of how difficult designing and launching a phone is. You definitely don't need to do all that work if all you want to do is make a phone with a smaller/better camera.
Another benefit is being able to repair your phone by swapping out a broken module rather than replacing the whole thing. This should reduce waste. Also, you don't need to get new phones every two years, you can just replace modules as they get outdated.
If done well enough, this could shift phones out of excessive consumerism, where buying a new phone is often cheaper than replacing an old one (or where repairing a phone is impossible).
Ugh, this has always been a terrible idea - apparently a vanity project by people who know nothing about how manufacturing works.
Every piece they make modular adds cost - cost of connectors, weight of the frame to support them, cost of support when the connectors fail.
You can go on about "waste" all you want, but the lowest cost, lowest material devices are rated for single-insertion connections along with components both stacked and heavily integrated.
The reason they could not do displays, RAM, etc is that these components are tightly integrated to the SOC selected, and change regularly. This was true when they announced, even more true now.
Truly Google is the new Microsoft if they devote such time to obvious executive vanity projects, untouched by the taint of reality.
All those costs in modularity apply to PCs, which are still around despite the hard drive to turn everything into a SOC. If I were able to get the same amount of use out of a modular phone as I have my daily driver PC (going on nearly 10 years) then I'd happily pay more for the robust design. I get that the popular justification for SOC is power savings, but the cost is so much higher than just incredibly rapid obsolescence. Consider all the software problems, the binary blobs, the lack of security updates, the vendor lock in... we really need to step off this crazy train.
Right, because we all know the most important feature of smart phones is their cost savings, which is why Apple phones sell close to their marginal cost and don't have 30% margins.
And this kind of device, while it may not be interesting for many consumers, will be very interested for industrial, enterprise, or medical users.
More Space. New Ideas.
The Ara frame contains the CPU, GPU, antennas, sensors, battery and display, freeing up more room for hardware in each module. We are looking to module makers to create technology never before seen on smartphones.
With 3D printers, cheaper cheapsets, ..., tinkerers can go on and try to create their own module which they can integrate into their phone. If the module is popular amongst users, integrate it either as a standard module in the ARA store (a 3rd party could for example propose to manufacture that module, shifting those costs to them, Google would just deliver the core ARA product).
I think that if this project succeeds, it will be as a standard phone you plug into a lot of different devices. Ara could be generic compute/storage/networking, and cheap enough for you to click one into your sprinkler system, your refrigerator, your car, and perhaps commercial equipment like your alarm system, security camera system, etc... All talking to each other and sharing a common uplink.
Now THIS here is the interesting idea, the ARA becomes the local compute component in a larger system, rather than having smaller components attaching to the ARA!
I'd settle for a phone that just lets me have source to everything that can be reflashed and allows me to practically modify and reflash as desired. I feel USB host would be good enough so that I can add peripherals as needed, I don't need fancy magnetic connectors.
I think the main thing this structure brings is the unbundling of camera module from the handset, so that larger sensor/lens modules can be offered. As it is, manufacturers are afraid that protrusions will hurt sales and are therefore hesitant to go with large sensors.
edit: On second thought, this may end up just being the foundation of Android-based camera backs. Should be a bit of help for camera makers, so that they can focus on the camera module.
> Should be a bit of help for camera makers, so that they can focus on the camera module.
Why would camera makers want to give up on the pattern of tying a new firmware feature to a minor case facelift to celebrate it as a new camera generation? Cameras are a market where a few compulsive update-buyers seem to greatly outweigh the masses of thrice-in-a-lifetime buyers in terms of number of devices sold.
Apparently, Google controls the frame and the core components. The "base unit" is not, apparently, separate from the frame, so you can't build frames in different sizes. You can't build a tablet size frame, or use the form factor as a packaging standard for embedded control or lab instruments.
As a mobile device, it should be heavier, bigger, and less rugged than an integrated unit, so that may not be a win.
The phone's going to be priced at the mid to high range. Including all the important components pre-built means that it can't be sold at a low price. 'A single phone for everyone' was the original idea, but it seems they've given up on it.
Very doubtful that this will lead to a lower-total-cost-of-ownership phone for anyone vs. buying the $30 Android phone and replacing it when it breaks.
More likely that this will become a standard compute/networking interface into a bunch of specialized modules (stereoscopic cameras, home automation, industrial control, etc.)
physical apps store will be a cool idea, especially with a macguiver-esque iot swiss army knife of add ons for health, security, communication & interacting with physical environment.
[+] [-] cryptoz|10 years ago|reply
r/android seems unimpressed because many of the initially removable components are no longer removable (at least, as indicated by marketing videos) [1]. However, it seems silly to me to get upset about this because this is a Developer Edition and Google clearly had to limit the scope of the project in order to ship. Though, one wonders if there are physical limits causing the CPU, GPU, battery, and display to be non-removable. We'll see.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/4k9bwr/project_ara...
[+] [-] squeaky-clean|10 years ago|reply
It's not that "many" of the components aren't available, it's all the components anyone cared about. It seems like you won't be able to swap out the CPU, GPU, RAM, battery or screen. So if you want a phone with a faster CPU, you need to buy an entirely new phone, which goes against all the hype for these modular phone plans.
From the venturebeat article linked below: "The idea of Ara is to ensure that your devices are future-proofed, meaning that the whole “upgrade every two years” mentality is no longer a thing. ". This certainly isn't true. Though I guess it could be slightly cheaper, since you would be just buying a frame, and could pop in your old camera module.
There also aren't any modules being shown that can clue you into what the potential is. The only thing recognizable is a camera module, and what I'm guessing is a small e-ink display., every other module is just an unlabeled colored/textured rectangle. In every article about it the only example ever used is a camera.
The module idea actually seems really cool, a standard way for anyone to create hardware for your phone. But I think the "modular phone. Upgrade one bit a time. Never obsolete." marketing angle is a blatant lie.
Edit: I agree with one of the jokes in that Reddit thread about this
Because really, what else is there?[+] [-] LeoPanthera|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] x1798DE|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] digi_owl|10 years ago|reply
And shipping this as a dev device will limit the scope of ideas developers will implement.
[+] [-] Zak|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] listic|10 years ago|reply
It doesn't have to be just a passive box; it could have a companion app and door open sensor. I'm using a separate device for that: http://www.amazon.com/Reizen-Vibrating-Five-Alarm-Pill/dp/B0...
[+] [-] listic|10 years ago|reply
'many' is CPU+GPU+RAM, which was going to be a single module, but now is part of the frame, right?
[+] [-] DiabloD3|10 years ago|reply
Oh well.
[+] [-] LeoPanthera|10 years ago|reply
Not going to disable my adblocker just to read a story. I consider it to be an anti-malware tool at this point.
[+] [-] mediocrejoker|10 years ago|reply
The addon says it blocked 32 elements.
[+] [-] yoodenvranx|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MichaelGG|10 years ago|reply
This is underrated, at least in the article. People love customizing. They'll spend money on that. Wood, gold, ceramic, organic-whatever, glass-with-bits-of-Holy-Land, and on and on. Even for basic parts, like the camera, people will pay just to have different colored rings around the lens.
Phone cases are one obvious example of all this, but being able to replace the materials of different parts of the phone seems like the next step.
I'm not convinced this project has much use otherwise, though. Would love to be wrong. But even their demo video shows nothing useful at all.
[+] [-] jsharf|10 years ago|reply
Another benefit is being able to repair your phone by swapping out a broken module rather than replacing the whole thing. This should reduce waste. Also, you don't need to get new phones every two years, you can just replace modules as they get outdated.
If done well enough, this could shift phones out of excessive consumerism, where buying a new phone is often cheaper than replacing an old one (or where repairing a phone is impossible).
[+] [-] dflock|10 years ago|reply
I imagine that there's a pretty interesting collection of niche markets for a capable, connected mobile device with interchangeable sensors.
[+] [-] yk|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zakalwe2000|10 years ago|reply
Every piece they make modular adds cost - cost of connectors, weight of the frame to support them, cost of support when the connectors fail.
You can go on about "waste" all you want, but the lowest cost, lowest material devices are rated for single-insertion connections along with components both stacked and heavily integrated.
The reason they could not do displays, RAM, etc is that these components are tightly integrated to the SOC selected, and change regularly. This was true when they announced, even more true now.
Truly Google is the new Microsoft if they devote such time to obvious executive vanity projects, untouched by the taint of reality.
[+] [-] woodman|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cromwellian|10 years ago|reply
And this kind of device, while it may not be interesting for many consumers, will be very interested for industrial, enterprise, or medical users.
[+] [-] lagudragu|10 years ago|reply
Taken from their developer page (https://atap.google.com/ara/):
More Space. New Ideas. The Ara frame contains the CPU, GPU, antennas, sensors, battery and display, freeing up more room for hardware in each module. We are looking to module makers to create technology never before seen on smartphones.
With 3D printers, cheaper cheapsets, ..., tinkerers can go on and try to create their own module which they can integrate into their phone. If the module is popular amongst users, integrate it either as a standard module in the ARA store (a 3rd party could for example propose to manufacture that module, shifting those costs to them, Google would just deliver the core ARA product).
[+] [-] qq66|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] genericone|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] grizzles|10 years ago|reply
I don't often wish for mandatory bundling, but I hope that's what this is about: http://techcrunch.com/2016/04/14/google-now-lets-you-design-...
[+] [-] linuxkerneldev|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dilemma|10 years ago|reply
edit: On second thought, this may end up just being the foundation of Android-based camera backs. Should be a bit of help for camera makers, so that they can focus on the camera module.
[+] [-] usrusr|10 years ago|reply
Why would camera makers want to give up on the pattern of tying a new firmware feature to a minor case facelift to celebrate it as a new camera generation? Cameras are a market where a few compulsive update-buyers seem to greatly outweigh the masses of thrice-in-a-lifetime buyers in terms of number of devices sold.
[+] [-] pessimizer|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Animats|10 years ago|reply
As a mobile device, it should be heavier, bigger, and less rugged than an integrated unit, so that may not be a win.
[+] [-] hackaflocka|10 years ago|reply
I really hope it works out. (I expect that if it does, then over time everything will be swappable.)
[+] [-] Brakenshire|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] qq66|10 years ago|reply
More likely that this will become a standard compute/networking interface into a bunch of specialized modules (stereoscopic cameras, home automation, industrial control, etc.)
[+] [-] snsr|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kenz0r|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vonklaus|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ommunist|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pier25|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] majestik|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] qptopm|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]