top | item 11844122

(no title)

skram | 9 years ago

A lot of this data can also be browsed by mere mortals at http://openbeta-contracts-explorer.usaspending.gov/ . More information is available at https://openbeta.usaspending.gov/ too.

discuss

order

wslh|9 years ago

I checked but is there any reason why the totals are pretty low? for example looking for Microsoft I found a total of 33M http://openbeta-contracts-explorer.usaspending.gov/#!/year/A...

danso|9 years ago

I don't know much about this new explorer tool, but it's based off of USASpending.gov which is a bit fickle...which is to be expected given the messiness of the data involved (companies have varied names, subsidiaries etc., among other real-life complexities).

But you can do an "advanced search" by registered company name, and this is what comes up for "Microsoft" -- probably doesn't include all of its subsidiaries that don't have "Microsoft" in the name: ~$1.4 billion in awarded contracts

https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/AdvancedSearch.aspx?sub=y&...

edit: Oh I know the reason for the discrepancy...the homepage of the beta app says it's only partial data:

> Added more years of contract data to now include 2011 - 2015

Spooky23|9 years ago

Government requires competition for purchases. So vendors like Dell, SHI, CDW, Carahsoft, etc are all wholesalers who compete over the pennies for fulfillment to sell Microsoft (and most other) software.

anton_tarasenko|9 years ago

Two reasons:

1. Agencies often buy from distributors and integrators, not publishers. In this case, original manufacturers may appear in the variable `descriptionofcontractrequirement`.

2. Spelling may differ. Variable `dunsnumber` is be a better indicator for uniqueness.