I don't know much about this new explorer tool, but it's based off of USASpending.gov which is a bit fickle...which is to be expected given the messiness of the data involved (companies have varied names, subsidiaries etc., among other real-life complexities).
But you can do an "advanced search" by registered company name, and this is what comes up for "Microsoft" -- probably doesn't include all of its subsidiaries that don't have "Microsoft" in the name: ~$1.4 billion in awarded contracts
Government requires competition for purchases. So vendors like Dell, SHI, CDW, Carahsoft, etc are all wholesalers who compete over the pennies for fulfillment to sell Microsoft (and most other) software.
1. Agencies often buy from distributors and integrators, not publishers. In this case, original manufacturers may appear in the variable `descriptionofcontractrequirement`.
2. Spelling may differ. Variable `dunsnumber` is be a better indicator for uniqueness.
wslh|9 years ago
skram|9 years ago
danso|9 years ago
But you can do an "advanced search" by registered company name, and this is what comes up for "Microsoft" -- probably doesn't include all of its subsidiaries that don't have "Microsoft" in the name: ~$1.4 billion in awarded contracts
https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/AdvancedSearch.aspx?sub=y&...
edit: Oh I know the reason for the discrepancy...the homepage of the beta app says it's only partial data:
> Added more years of contract data to now include 2011 - 2015
Spooky23|9 years ago
anton_tarasenko|9 years ago
1. Agencies often buy from distributors and integrators, not publishers. In this case, original manufacturers may appear in the variable `descriptionofcontractrequirement`.
2. Spelling may differ. Variable `dunsnumber` is be a better indicator for uniqueness.
anton_tarasenko|9 years ago