New Startup Ideas Spreadsheet
130 points| jcs | 16 years ago |spreadsheets.google.com | reply
Feel free to add your own ideas and leave feedback on the others. Also if you see something that interests you, get in contact and make it happen!
130 points| jcs | 16 years ago |spreadsheets.google.com | reply
Feel free to add your own ideas and leave feedback on the others. Also if you see something that interests you, get in contact and make it happen!
[+] [-] jcs|16 years ago|reply
Feel free to add your own ideas and leave feedback on the others. If you see something you like, get in contact and make it happen!
[+] [-] apsurd|16 years ago|reply
What I'm getting at:
Show don't tell.
So how about a list of products/service prototypes that people are actually building, and making that a starting point. I'd much rather take 10 seconds to click around on an app, than read text in a cell as noted above.
[+] [-] jpwagner|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lincolnq|16 years ago|reply
I guess I'd just rather read constructive posts first.
[+] [-] DaniFong|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dkokelley|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ntoshev|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Blasa|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] imp|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wallop|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tsally|16 years ago|reply
They're probably one of the worst examples. It was technical brilliance, not their idea, that allowed them to succeed.
[+] [-] bemmu|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jrockway|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] khelloworld|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ThomPete|16 years ago|reply
My take on this is.
If your idea is good you might as well put it out there as you won't be the only one who have thought about it.
If your idea is brilliant it will have no takers as brilliant ideas seem to be less obvious in the now and will only with time and in retrospect be obvious.
[+] [-] vlad|16 years ago|reply
If PageRank was closely guarded in any way, it could have been so that Page and Brin could submit their research paper about it to SIGIR--at which point it would be public. On the other hand, Page and Brin hosted the search engine for anybody to use.
2) As an aside, assuming the page below is the actual paper, does it mean Larry and Brin already have funding at the time they were writing it up? It mentions that users should try the search engine out at google.stanford.edu, but supposedly, it was their first investor who named Google.
http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
[+] [-] DaniFong|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dbz|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dkokelley|16 years ago|reply
I know it's a little bit out there, but I think it would be a fun startup to make something like this work.
[+] [-] ntoshev|16 years ago|reply
http://tqft.net/wiki/Maneki_Neko
[+] [-] spokey|16 years ago|reply
You could also expand it in various ways beyond tracking new releases for a single band to make it more of a music discovery service, e.g., (a) tracking side projects started by members of a given band or band "communities" where there are several inter-related artists and bands that appear in various ways in one another's work (like Broken Social Scene, Wu Tang Clan or The Bird and the Bee) (b) tracking other bands/albums/songs etc. that someone had a hand in (e.g., show me new releases that Pharrell Williams produced) and somewhat obviously (c) tracking new releases in a given genre, which could be very fine grained.
[+] [-] khangtoh|16 years ago|reply
Interested to collaborate on it, or has something to say about the idea, drop a note on the community feedback column on spreadsheet! Thanks!
[+] [-] dzlobin|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DaniFong|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nc|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rafd|16 years ago|reply
..but then again, a lot of these problems could be solved with some sort of (online web app?) system: a) Basecamp tweaked for massive collaboration. b) StackOverflow-esque reputation system + karma + uservoice demand identification? c) No suggestions here yet, but HN seems to be doing a pretty good job at engineering away the Digg-problem.
[+] [-] mixmax|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jayair|16 years ago|reply
It probably sounds more fun than it is going to be. But it should be cool.
[+] [-] maxklein|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amazonfx|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dkokelley|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jasonlbaptiste|16 years ago|reply
100% return lottery.
pandora for chatroulette.
Wordpress.com 20 years more advanced, for video blogging.
Public Takeover - Use capitalism to control the ills of capitalism, one share at a time. Use crowdsourcing and social network effects to take over public companies by linking all socially-responsible minority shareholders.
*Dog Walking 2.0 - potential acquirer 37 signals?
[+] [-] JayNeely|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DaniFong|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tocomment|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coryl|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pjharrin|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coryl|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mtrimpe|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] khangtoh|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] t3rcio|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dnsworks|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dnsworks|16 years ago|reply