On a side note, it is interesting how many incredible projects started from KDE (and how few survived or at least gained major traction): KMail, KDevelop, KOffice, not to mention Konqueror - KHTML / Webkit lives on, but Konqueror users are very rare. Does anyone know why this is happening?
There is still FUD about the licensing, decades on. And a lot of Linux vendors make Gnome the default - perhaps partly because it's less configurable and so easier to support, but partly it does seem to be this weird prejudice. I wonder whether it's a US/EU thing - most of KDE seems to be developed in the EU and the major European distros (which is only really SuSE these days now that Mandriva doesn't exist any more) seem to have it as default, whereas the American distros seem to prefer Gnome.
I think it's because Qt has traditionally had a pretty weird dual- or tri-licensing model: https://www.qt.io/faq/#_Toc453700684 which resulted in less adoption by developers because of the viral nature of the GPL.
IIRC, it used to be that even the core Qt libs were GPL (unless you paid for a commercial license), while now most (but still not all) libs are also available under the LGPL.
Don't want to diminish KDE, but how is that incredible considering that for each of these there is a much more popular GTK or even Gnome project software?
annnnd|9 years ago
lmm|9 years ago
Zardoz84|9 years ago
mpercy|9 years ago
IIRC, it used to be that even the core Qt libs were GPL (unless you paid for a commercial license), while now most (but still not all) libs are also available under the LGPL.
GTK has always been plain LGPL 2. Nothing scary.
djsumdog|9 years ago
allendoerfer|9 years ago
blub|9 years ago
Krita serves their website over https and the download over http from some mirror. Can't find any trace of a hash on their site either.
p4bl0|9 years ago
expression|9 years ago
minitech|9 years ago
kiba|9 years ago
That being said, we have to trust something.
imaginenore|9 years ago
https://krita.org/en/item/krita-3-0-released/