top | item 12206465

(no title)

LA_Banker | 9 years ago

There's a certain, perverse form of cognitive dissonance in thinking what Gawker did to Hogan was wrong, but ViolentAcrez and his posting of creepshots of underage girls was somehow unimpeachable free speech – and therefore his freedom to continue doing such ought to be protected.

Do not the girls and women whose privacy he was invading not deserve the same right to privacy?

discuss

order

jedberg|9 years ago

I never said what VA was doing was right or wrong, not did I say what they did to Hogan was right or wrong.

I just said I don't feel bad because they were unethical in their journalism and caused real harm to people because of it (real people besides VA).

LA_Banker|9 years ago

[deleted]

abz126|9 years ago

[deleted]