top | item 12253276

The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)

218 points| _gjrn | 9 years ago |openculture.com

64 comments

order
[+] stygiansonic|9 years ago|reply
Reminds me of Total Resistance[0], written for the Swiss population in case of occupation by Warsaw Pact forces.

Besides the sections on guerrilla warfare tactics, there's also section civil disobedience. Generally this involves workers acting as incompetently as possible:

"Employees in plants and shops

Work slowly. Turn out poor quality goods and produce many rejects. Take a break often. Treat machinery, installations and engines carelessly. Cause excessive waste. Use excessive quantities of water, power, fuel and grease. Take excessive sick leave."

0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Resistance_(book)

[+] abawany|9 years ago|reply
The Czech people were already one step ahead of this manual. According to Madeleine Albright's book Prague Winter, the Czech factory workers during the WWII occupation by Nazi Germany worked hard at personal peril to ensure that the goods they made for the German war effort were not up to their usually excellent standards of workmanship (excerpt: Or the message found in the casing of an unexploded bomb from Czech factory workers:“Don’t be afraid,” it said, “The bombs we make will never explode.” [1]). Best book I have read in a while albeit a very sad read.

[1] http://www.aspeninstitute.cz/en/article/0-2012-like-a-czech-...

[+] CamperBob2|9 years ago|reply
Similarly, one of the other bits of advice for subversives and saboteurs that I've always liked went something like, "Do not dissent, object, or otherwise attempt to reinterpret your orders. Do exactly what you're told to do at all times. Orders from management will often yield contradictory or counterproductive results if followed to the letter."

That gem was from one of the WWII-era OSS manuals as well, if I remember correctly, aimed at French Resistance operatives working in Nazi-controlled factories.

[+] dr_hooo|9 years ago|reply
Great, now I have to assume that my team has been infiltrated by a bunch of CIA agents...
[+] vibrio|9 years ago|reply
...and we have to assume you are a master agent leading a crack team of saboteurs.
[+] imjustsaying|9 years ago|reply
>Read the CIA’s Simple Sabotage Field Manual: A Timeless, Kafkaesque Guide to Subverting Any Organization with “Purposeful Stupidity” (1944)

Looks like they took advantage of the theory that "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice"

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Grey%27s%20La...

[+] clifanatic|9 years ago|reply
The corollary being: if your boss doesn't understand what you do, he's always going to assume you're deliberately sabotaging him. And for most of us, our boss doesn't understand what we do.
[+] revicon|9 years ago|reply
Valeris: Four hundred years ago on the planet Earth, workers who felt their livelihood threated by automation flung their wooden shoes called sabots into the machines to stop them. Hence the word sabotage.

Uhura: We are experiencing technical malfunction. All backup systems inoperative.

Chekov: Excellent-I mean, too bad.

[+] ralfd|9 years ago|reply
Wasn't Valeris the vulcan woman who turned out to be evil at the end?
[+] nxc18|9 years ago|reply
I recently saw a great blog series about sabotage and how to defeat it in the context of projects. Sabotage often happens for personal and political reasons and he lays out clear ways to defeat it.

https://coding.abel.nu/series/project-saboteurs/

It is a great read.

[+] gonzo41|9 years ago|reply
I remember a lot of this stuff on the Internet before the internet of books turned into the internet of videos. Oh and 9/11 had an impact.
[+] rangibaby|9 years ago|reply
The Anarchists Cookbook "2000", those were the days.
[+] kelvin0|9 years ago|reply
What to do when you realize your CEO is masterfully implementing the "processes" described in the handbook? I left ... any similar experiences?
[+] Tharkun|9 years ago|reply
I'm amused by the CIA's use of the metric system in the manual. If only the rest of the US would follow ...
[+] kej|9 years ago|reply
Even if they didn't otherwise use metric, it would make sense for them to use it here since the ultimate goal was to have the metric-using citizens of Axis-occupied countries carry out the sabotage.
[+] pdabbadabba|9 years ago|reply
Most (all?) U.S. regulatory agencies also use the metric system.
[+] clifanatic|9 years ago|reply
Maybe that's part of their sabotage plan.
[+] woliveirajr|9 years ago|reply
I can swear someone got a copy in 1945, changed the cover to disguise it using some title like "Modern management", and since then it has been used as inspiration tho many management books and guides.

It's incredible how those "tips" from the end of the article resemble some public/private companies that I've worked on.

[+] mentos|9 years ago|reply
Is this document tongue in cheek?
[+] DanBC|9 years ago|reply
No.

Sabotage is a useful technique in wartime. The CIA (the the OSS) investigated something like 15,000 supposed acts of sabotage in the US during WWII. (I don't think they found any that were actual sabotage).

They'd want to promote sabotage in Axis countries, and to prevent sabotage-like activity in allied countries, as much as possible.

[+] tfgg|9 years ago|reply
It certainly always elicits a lot of "Hurdur this is my company", feels a bit too perfectly written for that reaction to not be satire.
[+] sbjustin|9 years ago|reply
This sounds like an manager's handbook today.
[+] RamshackleJ|9 years ago|reply
make sure you hold daily all hands on deck meetings where everyone is required to listen to what everyone else was doing the last 24 hours.

require all work to be logged in the proper system so that any exceptional productivity will be tempered by time spent updating tickets

[+] 1_listerine_pls|9 years ago|reply
The complete guide to success in government.
[+] curried_haskell|9 years ago|reply
You think it's just government? Have you worked much in the private sector?
[+] sickbeard|9 years ago|reply
I'm not sure the CIA document supports this article. He seems to be talking about incompetence while the article is about sabotage
[+] nxzero|9 years ago|reply
Plausible deniability is a huge factor in convert operations.

If the target can't prove something is intentional, it compounds the damage done, manages risks, etc.