(no title)
aggieben | 9 years ago
2. I think tests like this that rely on a built-out network and well-placed CDNs and such are probably junk. A more useful test would be against a handful of download targets that aren't optimized, and then average the results. This is particularly true for Netflix. Case in point: fast.com says I download at 78Mbps, but speedtest.net has me down around 57. I'm only paying for 30.
fizzbatter|9 years ago
I'm firmly untrusting of Comcast's results on speedtest.. If Comcast is intentionally throttling, it's in their interest to not throttle Speedtest. However if we can monitor real data.. that actually seems useful.
I understand that would likely require additional resources from video/etc providers, and is likely an unrealistic request from video/etc providers.. but i definitely don't need more test sites for Comcast to manipulate.
Disclaimer: I don't know the subject domain, so apologies if i'm insanely off base.
djrogers|9 years ago
Depends on the goal - here Netflix wants to see how fast you can stream from their "built-out network and well placed CDNs" so testing those is completely relevant. For their purposes, testing a bunch of unoptimized and unrelated services would be "junk".
niftich|9 years ago
Absolutely right; but also in this case, Netflix' and the average downloader's needs align, given that the bulk (by share of bytes) of legal speed-sensitive downstream traffic is video.
m1r3k|9 years ago
aggieben|9 years ago
netinstructions|9 years ago
https://www.google.com/get/videoqualityreport/
parennoob|9 years ago
blakeyrat|9 years ago
forcer|9 years ago
Granted we do not have many results in the US (maybe ballpark 200k+ results in last 6 months), still you should be able to find some results in your area.
dmix|9 years ago
Most election/political polls use far less data and very big decisions get made because of them.
swasheck|9 years ago