[iofj]

I don't understand how your statements aren't a direct logical contradiction. One of two things is true:

1) we are able to predict the effect of external changes to earth's climate.

2) we are not.

In the first case, we can predict climate change and find an effect to change the climate to suit us. In the second case we can do neither. But the idea that we can predict climate change but are unable to predict the effect of deliberate changes doesn't fit in either situation.

So how can you hold this position ? It does not make sense ?

Furthermore, I seriously doubt preppers in Montana are a significant part of the climate change policy makers.