[spriggan3]

> They don't need his blessing

They are putting his name everywhere in the campaign like he is involved or something. He is clearly not. That's misleading and can be potentially detrimental to the person's reputation if the campaign ends up being a scam.

Again they might have the right to use his assets, they don't have the right to use his name to get money from people like this. That's completely wrong.

[carussell]

If the work is CC-BY, attribution the one thing that they are compelled to do. That's the whole point of the license.

[spriggan3]

> It's attribution

Give me a break, this campaign is misleading, on purpose, in order to get some money.