top | item 12404066 (no title) asuffield | 9 years ago That's not precisely accurate. The EC's ruling is that the Irish government changed the law in an unlawful way. There has not yet been an explicit ruling on Apple's conduct, as far as I know - that's likely to take more time (years...) to happen. discuss order hn newest Oletros|9 years ago > That's not precisely accurate. The EC's ruling is that the Irish government changed the law in an unlawful way.The ruling is that the Irish Government applied wrongly the actual law, no law has been changed> There has not yet been an explicit ruling on Apple's conduct, as far as I know - that's likely to take more time (years...) to happen.The investigation is not on Apple, but on the Irish Government. My comment about illegality was about the Irish Government practices, not about Apple.
Oletros|9 years ago > That's not precisely accurate. The EC's ruling is that the Irish government changed the law in an unlawful way.The ruling is that the Irish Government applied wrongly the actual law, no law has been changed> There has not yet been an explicit ruling on Apple's conduct, as far as I know - that's likely to take more time (years...) to happen.The investigation is not on Apple, but on the Irish Government. My comment about illegality was about the Irish Government practices, not about Apple.
Oletros|9 years ago
The ruling is that the Irish Government applied wrongly the actual law, no law has been changed
> There has not yet been an explicit ruling on Apple's conduct, as far as I know - that's likely to take more time (years...) to happen.
The investigation is not on Apple, but on the Irish Government. My comment about illegality was about the Irish Government practices, not about Apple.