By the way, one thing I have discovered (the hard way, mostly) in teaching as an adjunct is that there is no penalty for being boring but there can be a penalty for being interesting, at least for many values of "interesting." I wrote a post "How do you know when you’re being insensitive? How do you know when you’re funny?" (https://jakeseliger.com/2014/12/22/how-do-you-know-when-your...) that deals in part with these issues.
The tedium of the school system is real, but it is also in part a reaction to a simple nature fact: A single unhappy student (or parent) can cause a great deal of stress and a great number of problems for a given teacher or set of administrators. Consequently, the default of the individual teacher is towards material and processes that are inoffensive—and easy to grade on a pass-fail basis. The worry for many teachers and administrators is about the worst-case scenario.
I used to wonder why school is so boring and I used to promise myself that if I were in charge it'd be different. Now I know why.
...high school is wondrously efficient at making interesting things dull..."
Ain't that the truth. I learned that not because I recognized it my day to day as a student, but because I had one or two teachers in high school that were absolutely exceptional (I was lucky, some kids encounter none) and the droning background noise of the rest of education became very stark in comparison.
It's impossible to teach hundreds of students a year and make everything fantastical the whole time (not to mention that some kids will never give one f*ck about US History or whatever their natural predilections dictate) but man oh man does the current Common Core driven, test-everything, no-rote-learning-except-test-all-rote-learning way of looking at education just crush students.
And you don't have to ask a student - most teachers today will bemoan the degree to which their hands are tied to properly educate and, more importantly, make learning fun, by bureaucracies run by educational theorists who have never spent a day in a classroom.
I can think of three high school classes that were great because of the teachers (an English class, a geometry class, and a shop class), and maybe three that were great because of their self-learning nature (my first programming class, an engineering class, and an after-school electronics+engineering class taught by the shop teacher).
For everything else, I've got to agree. Take my US History class. I think it's important to know the events that shaped our culture, know roughly the order they came in, and about when they happened and why. The name and date of a 19th century law involving share croppers? Sure, I'll be able to write an essay on it for the test, because I know that's the requirement, but ask me 6 months later, and I won't be able to tell you much about it.
Standardized testing really doesn't help this either. Yes you could take a couple of weeks to do a deep dive on an interesting topic to get the students engaged, but to pass the test they need to be memorizing the same dates and names that everybody in the country has to memorize in order to pass the test.
Granted, most teachers were doing that anyway, but for the few who bucked the trend they were reined in by the SOLs.
In the same vein, sure, but an order of magnitude more grim. And more beautiful. I'll recommend this article until the sun burns out. Or until the educational system gets its act together -- but I repeat myself.
My high school was an interesting experience. It was a poor area and they expected few of the students to go to further education - but rather than use that as an excuse to treat the students like losers, the school tried to include some of the spread of college and vocational-school classes. I ended up taking lessons on archery, welding, video editing, and Latin, among other things.
The article was fun to read, deceptively informal. In fact the writing is brilliant. Almost every sentence has some delightful, unexpected word or phrase instead of cliche. It also relies heavily on sound. Even when you read silently, you hear the words. So alliteration, echo, rhyme, and rhythm are still important.
I thought the writing was boring. I had to skip around to get to the part where he hated schools. Then he didn't really make any conclusion anyway except "less structure, lol"
During high school I became aware of community colleges and it actually occurred to me that all the homework and stress involved with maintaining a high GPA simply wasn't worth it. I took easy electives and barely passed everything else.
[+] [-] jseliger|9 years ago|reply
The tedium of the school system is real, but it is also in part a reaction to a simple nature fact: A single unhappy student (or parent) can cause a great deal of stress and a great number of problems for a given teacher or set of administrators. Consequently, the default of the individual teacher is towards material and processes that are inoffensive—and easy to grade on a pass-fail basis. The worry for many teachers and administrators is about the worst-case scenario.
I used to wonder why school is so boring and I used to promise myself that if I were in charge it'd be different. Now I know why.
[+] [-] themartorana|9 years ago|reply
Ain't that the truth. I learned that not because I recognized it my day to day as a student, but because I had one or two teachers in high school that were absolutely exceptional (I was lucky, some kids encounter none) and the droning background noise of the rest of education became very stark in comparison.
It's impossible to teach hundreds of students a year and make everything fantastical the whole time (not to mention that some kids will never give one f*ck about US History or whatever their natural predilections dictate) but man oh man does the current Common Core driven, test-everything, no-rote-learning-except-test-all-rote-learning way of looking at education just crush students.
And you don't have to ask a student - most teachers today will bemoan the degree to which their hands are tied to properly educate and, more importantly, make learning fun, by bureaucracies run by educational theorists who have never spent a day in a classroom.
[+] [-] khedoros|9 years ago|reply
For everything else, I've got to agree. Take my US History class. I think it's important to know the events that shaped our culture, know roughly the order they came in, and about when they happened and why. The name and date of a 19th century law involving share croppers? Sure, I'll be able to write an essay on it for the test, because I know that's the requirement, but ask me 6 months later, and I won't be able to tell you much about it.
[+] [-] jandrese|9 years ago|reply
Granted, most teachers were doing that anyway, but for the few who bucked the trend they were reined in by the SOLs.
[+] [-] r00fus|9 years ago|reply
It's the testing and what's being tested that sounds mind killing.
[+] [-] FeepingCreature|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pjscott|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zyxley|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] combatentropy|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iopq|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] panic|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Uroboric|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ninjabeans|9 years ago|reply