top | item 12728590

We can confirm Ecuador cut off Assange's internet access Saturday, 5pm GMT

44 points| ryanlol | 9 years ago |twitter.com

18 comments

order
[+] mihok|9 years ago|reply
Does anyone know what the cryptic tweets[1][2][3], that this tweet was following up to, refer to? onion address?

1. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787781519951720449 2. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787781046519693316 3. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787777344740163584

[+] nateberkopec|9 years ago|reply
SHA-256 hashes of future documents to be released.

It's insurance to make sure Ecuador doesn't turn Assange over.

[+] dhbanes|9 years ago|reply
They appear to be SHA256 hashes.
[+] rebootthesystem|9 years ago|reply
To get philosophical, when are we really free?

We seem to be learning, at various levels, that the very people we elect to represent us --our employees-- have distorted the contract they have with us to the point where they think it is OK to deprive us freedoms as they see fit.

This isn't good. It has the makings of something very ugly going forward. It's the proverbial slippery slope.

[+] Overtonwindow|9 years ago|reply
That... is very strange. Why did Ecuador cut off his internet? Hyperbole and conspiracy aside, that would seem like a very overt warning to Assange (if true) that if he continues to release, Ecuador will withdraw its protection. Very strange.
[+] TheDrizzle43|9 years ago|reply
There's rumors it's related to a pending charge for grooming of a minor online, who knows though. I'm sure we will find out the real reason in the next few days so I'll wait for that rather than go into full tinfoil hat conspiracy theory territory.
[+] whybroke|9 years ago|reply
>...Hyperbole and conspiracy aside...

good luck with that.

[+] ryanlol|9 years ago|reply
Seems pretty strange that he can't just hop on 4G, they had that the last time I was in London.

It'd be pretty surprising if they were actually jamming wireless networks, but I guess that's what these tweets have to be implying.

[+] dragonwriter|9 years ago|reply
We're you inside a foreign embassy at the time? There are very good reasons that modern embassies often have countermeasures against signals being transmitted into and out of them (including sometimes being constructed as faraday cages), except for those controlled by the government the embassy represents.
[+] wbhart|9 years ago|reply
Wouldn't it be easy to intercept 4G, e.g. by setting up a fake 4G cell. Anyway, their previous tweets state that contingency plans have been enacted, which surely implies they've set up something alternative.
[+] TylerH|9 years ago|reply
He's probably not allowed anywhere that gets 4G coverage, at least not while also possessing a device capable of connecting to 4G or 3G