Nice PDF. Some cool new stuff, smart decisions & remarks (noise, hotpixels, matching frames, etc).
If you have an iOS device, check out the app Average Cam Pro[1]. I've had it on my iPad for several years now. It does an awesome job taking noise-free, detailed pictures (as long as you don't hold it in your hand) by taking up to 100 pictures and merging them. You can adjust exposure etc. after the fact. Great stuff.
I have yet to find a good replacement for my Android phone. The closest thing to [1] is Multiple Exposure Camera [2] which has a terrible interface and no exposure setting, but some other nifty settings to remove moving objects etc. (note: just don't use the 0s interval or it crashes)
That was a great read, back in the early 80's at the Image Processing Lab at USC there was a project to turn, what was then, a new "CCD" imager into something that could collect images that were useful for image analysis. At the time these "TV" cameras were equivalent to a really low end web camera. What we came up with was basically the first half of this talk, taking frame after frame and integrating it into the frame buffer with a filter function. Sad that I can't find the technical reports in Google Books.
Very impressive! I have an app on my android that follows the same basic idea (accumulate frames) but doesn't come anywhere near this.
Unfortunately the author, in a reply to a youtube comment, stated that this is work he did for Google and doesn't know if the company has any plans for this.
He's Marc Levoy and he knows Google's plans very well; he just can't talk about them on YouTube, since it's the stuff that gets announced on stage at I/O and similar events.
There is an old free software package ALE ( https://unix4lyfe.org/ale/ ) that does some of the processing like this. It was much easier to get working if you had linear light images... and registration of really noisy images was quite hard on it.
Here's a (v short) video by the paper's author showing the app in action with there manuscript that features early on in the paper: https://youtu.be/S7lbnMd56Ys
Is this what makes the google pixel phone camera so outstanding? it would explain why a technically inferior camera (slower aperture, no optical image stabilisation) outperforms both apple and Samsung flagship phones.
A bit of both. Hubble can have single exposures that are hundreds of seconds long - but remember it's in low orbit, so eventually the subject will fall beneath the horizon. Most Hubble observations stitch together exposures from multiple orbits. Ultra Deep Field is an extreme example which comprises ~a million seconds of exposure over 400 orbits: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Ultra-Deep_Field
notlisted|9 years ago
If you have an iOS device, check out the app Average Cam Pro[1]. I've had it on my iPad for several years now. It does an awesome job taking noise-free, detailed pictures (as long as you don't hold it in your hand) by taking up to 100 pictures and merging them. You can adjust exposure etc. after the fact. Great stuff.
I have yet to find a good replacement for my Android phone. The closest thing to [1] is Multiple Exposure Camera [2] which has a terrible interface and no exposure setting, but some other nifty settings to remove moving objects etc. (note: just don't use the 0s interval or it crashes)
[1] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/average-camera-pro/id4155778...
[2] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.conslazy.m...
ricw|9 years ago
It's Nothing like what the paper describes.
ChuckMcM|9 years ago
andmarios|9 years ago
Unfortunately the author, in a reply to a youtube comment, stated that this is work he did for Google and doesn't know if the company has any plans for this.
puzzle|9 years ago
unknown|9 years ago
[deleted]
nullc|9 years ago
nmstoker|9 years ago
br1n0|9 years ago
tambourine_man|9 years ago
ricw|9 years ago
mparlane|9 years ago
jjcm|9 years ago
mparlane|9 years ago
I think I can post this instead as it doesn't use my Public folder: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ixruqswy86fwr8t/seeinthedark-publi...
trhway|9 years ago
dandelany|9 years ago
Aoyagi|9 years ago
Mine have... 1020 and 808.
dsjoerg|9 years ago
hughes|9 years ago
br1n0|9 years ago
[deleted]