Yep, i'm no expert, but a BGP looking glass seems to suggest that all of the best paths (chosen by AS pathlength?) are not being advertised to peers... But some routes are being advertised? Idk
Router: Palo Alto, CA - US
Command: show ip bgp 104.244.42.193
BGP routing table entry for 104.244.42.0/24
Versions:
Process bRIB/RIB SendTblVer
Speaker 261897778 261897778
Last Modified: Nov 7 06:11:36.675 for 00:02:37
Paths: (4 available, best #3)
Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer):
0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7
Advertised to peers (in unique update groups):
129.250.47.126 129.250.9.146 128.242.180.62 80.150.168.193
128.241.2.58
Path #1: Received by speaker 0
Not advertised to any peer
13414 13414
116.51.31.10 (metric 14530) from 129.250.0.18 (129.250.0.18)
Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, confed-internal
Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 0
Community: 2914:370 2914:1405 2914:2406 2914:3400 65400:4134 65420:4134 65460:4134
Path #2: Received by speaker 0
Not advertised to any peer
13414 13414
62.73.183.110 (metric 28640) from 129.250.0.30 (129.250.0.30)
Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, confed-internal
Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 0
Community: 2914:370 2914:1204 2914:2205 2914:3200 65400:4134 65420:4134 65460:4134
Path #3: Received by speaker 0
Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer):
0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7
Advertised to peers (in unique update groups):
129.250.47.126 129.250.9.146 128.242.180.62 80.150.168.193
128.241.2.58
13414 13414
129.250.195.210 (metric 7029) from 129.250.0.115 (129.250.0.167)
Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, confed-internal, best, group-best
Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 1, version 261897778
Community: 2914:370 2914:1007 2914:2000 2914:3000 65400:4134 65420:4134 65460:4134
Originator: 129.250.0.167, Cluster list: 0.0.0.6
Path #4: Received by speaker 0
Not advertised to any peer
13414 13414
129.250.195.210 (metric 7029) from 129.250.0.116 (129.250.0.167)
Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, confed-internal
Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 0
Community: 2914:370 2914:1007 2914:2000 2914:3000 65400:4134 65420:4134 65460:4134
Originator: 129.250.0.167, Cluster list: 0.0.0.6
edit: sorry about formatting, i've tried to clean it up.
Their API is down too - started slowing down at 2016-11-07T05:44:52Z and went offline in earnest at 2016-11-07T05:47:37Z.
As you can imagine - we have a lot of analytics on this sort of stuff at Zapier. :-) Usually we know about API outages before any official status pages update (besides our own https://status.zapier.com/#app-status). Ironically Twitter's status page is also down... https://dev.twitter.com/overview/status (or maybe that is just their status API? hard to tell).
It is pretty rare for Twitter to go down - even for a moment.
Update - at 2016-11-07T06:12:55Z we're seeing some HTTP 200s...
status.twitter.com redirects to https://status.twitterstat.us/ which presumably is their official status page. Which, by the way, reports that all systems are operational.
Very possible, a few places are already predicting it.
All the major news stations would love that scenario. Each station gets to broadcast the news they want to say without that pesky little social media providing information that may counter what they are saying.
I get a 502 for Wikileaks but consensus is there's no BGP announcements for twitter. Possible it's the same attacker but they seem to be two different attacks.
[+] [-] robbiet480|9 years ago|reply
[1]: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
[2]: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2016-November/0098...
[+] [-] xiaodown|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Myrth|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bryanh|9 years ago|reply
As you can imagine - we have a lot of analytics on this sort of stuff at Zapier. :-) Usually we know about API outages before any official status pages update (besides our own https://status.zapier.com/#app-status). Ironically Twitter's status page is also down... https://dev.twitter.com/overview/status (or maybe that is just their status API? hard to tell).
It is pretty rare for Twitter to go down - even for a moment.
Update - at 2016-11-07T06:12:55Z we're seeing some HTTP 200s...
[+] [-] xiaodown|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] mysticlabs|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wybiral|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] orthoganol|9 years ago|reply
https://www.facebook.com/wikileaks/posts/1145935365441574
[+] [-] mmaunder|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noobermin|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] personjerry|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LeoPanthera|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xiaodown|9 years ago|reply
Queue hordes of people typing "man finger"...
[+] [-] thought_alarm|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bmiranda|9 years ago|reply
We'll find out soon enough.
[+] [-] pixl97|9 years ago|reply
All the major news stations would love that scenario. Each station gets to broadcast the news they want to say without that pesky little social media providing information that may counter what they are saying.
[+] [-] jgome|9 years ago|reply
Hmm...
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] sergers|9 years ago|reply
Reddit, yc, Netflix, I had no issues
[+] [-] sergers|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] idlewords|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jdub|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jdub|9 years ago|reply
Bit of a BGP blip there. Nothing to worry about. It's not like anyone's been practising attacks on fundamental Internet infrastructure.
[+] [-] StreamBright|9 years ago|reply
http://twitterstatus.tumblr.com/
[+] [-] ben174|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dsmithatx|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] datatapes|9 years ago|reply
http://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/57422927
[+] [-] rst|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mvindahl|9 years ago|reply
Edit: it's up again
[+] [-] noobermin|9 years ago|reply
EDIT: I just tweeted... https://twitter.com/noobermin/status/795510255333556224
[+] [-] enzanki_ars|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Mao_Zedang|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jackweirdy|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] product50|9 years ago|reply
Don't even know what to say anymore.
[+] [-] elcapitan|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] myf01d|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anaolykarpov|9 years ago|reply
although, http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ reports it as down
Edit: I'm from Romania
[+] [-] timgws|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] foota|9 years ago|reply