[hooph00p]

Gas lighting doesn't change the tone of your rhetoric. Drawing conclusions from what you said isn't a big stretch, given that you were dismissive, and clearly invested in the scientific portion of the MIT statement:

> Science and all that

Really sounds like you chose MIT. You know there's a part in there where they acknowledge climate change? That's pretty important.

> Social Justice Rhetoric on HN.

Again, really hard to take you seriously.

[wyclif]

You engaged in standard read-in to my comment, not even trying to understand what was meant. You say that "it's hard to take you seriously", yet the HN guidelines are clearly on my side of this issue.