> The reason why so much of it was negative is because the majority of things he said were flat out lies or smearing other people.
What if your beloved media companies dedicated themselves to spin everything Trump said to cast it at a bad light, and bent themselves backwards to filter in only the unpopular stuff?
There was no impartial coverage of Trump. In fact, the US coverage did its best to focus only on two candidates, and invested heavily in gunning down one of those candiates. This, in spite of their pet candidate being involved in multiple criminal investigations and suffering from debilitating health problems.
Sorry, 'serge', but I am gonna call out things the president-elect says - such as that three million people voted illegally in the last election - as what they are: grade A bullshit.
geezerjay|9 years ago
What if your beloved media companies dedicated themselves to spin everything Trump said to cast it at a bad light, and bent themselves backwards to filter in only the unpopular stuff?
There was no impartial coverage of Trump. In fact, the US coverage did its best to focus only on two candidates, and invested heavily in gunning down one of those candiates. This, in spite of their pet candidate being involved in multiple criminal investigations and suffering from debilitating health problems.
sergiotapia|9 years ago
yolesaber|9 years ago