It seems to me that it's using Quicktime's midi engine. The focus is not on sound synthesis at all, it's on composition. When you download the composition it's sent to you as a midi file. With that you can easily assign better sounds than the ones provided by Quicktime.
Mind you the Terms of Use are brutal and you're basically not supposed to do anything with that midi file anyways. Pretty much any creative use of it could be considered derivative works.
This is pretty cool but I am a bit disappointed. The classical generator doesn't generate any recognizable genre of classical music that I've ever heard. I managed to get one that sounded like a phase-cycle piece without actually having any phasing.
I first heard about WolframTones on The website of the physicist turned mathematician John Baez. He composed a pretty decent album using WolframTunes called Treq Lila: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/music/treq_lila/
[+] [-] jhuckestein|16 years ago|reply
Amazing. Whoever didn't see it yet should watch Stephen Wolfram's talk about computation: http://www.ted.com/talks/stephen_wolfram_computing_a_theory_...
[+] [-] najirama|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shachaf|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] superk|16 years ago|reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6mynON6eQI
(If you have an Amiga lying around you can run the actual demo)
That's multi channel digital audio (+ graphics) in under 4000 bytes. Wolfram sounds like the ROM off a synthesizer back in the early 90's.
[+] [-] brunoc|16 years ago|reply
Mind you the Terms of Use are brutal and you're basically not supposed to do anything with that midi file anyways. Pretty much any creative use of it could be considered derivative works.
[+] [-] bigiain|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Goladus|16 years ago|reply
I'll probably keep an eye on it though.
[+] [-] omaranto|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jblochjohnson|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] albertcardona|16 years ago|reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Scott
[+] [-] fara|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] metamemetics|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jey|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shortformblog|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] elbenshira|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] techiferous|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chengas123|16 years ago|reply