top | item 13194252

(no title)

> It was actually Steve Russel

I seem to recall reading that McCarthy was actually surprised to discover that Lisp _could_ be run by a real computer; he intended it to be a completely theoretical tool.

discuss

mroll|9 years ago

I have also heard that, but only from secondary sources. Here is a clip of Russell talking about the time he wrote the first lisp interpreter. He doesn't mention McCarthy being surprised, but he seems to imply that he, Russell, was quicker to grasp the idea of translating the functions McCarthy had been writing to machine code.

http://www.computerhistory.org/pdp-1/1020b307d766e0019de2b4a...

aap_|9 years ago

No, that's definitely wrong. Initially they compiled LISP code into assembly by hand (when LISP still looked a lot like fortran) and the plan was to write a compiler in assembly to automate that. Instead, McCarthy came up with a way to express LISP code (aka M-expressions) as data (aka S-expressions) to give a definition the LISP semantics in LISP itself. Steve Russell then hand compiled this definition, and lo, they had a working interpreter of S-expressions. M-expressions were never implemented and the compiler was written in LISP instead of assembly.