top | item 13261646

33rd Chaos Communication Congress Livestreams

296 points| mpoloton | 9 years ago |streaming.media.ccc.de | reply

41 comments

order
[+] mnutt|9 years ago|reply
I recently came across the software they use for mixing their livestreams, and it looks really useful for anyone trying to build out a system to stream or record talks:

https://github.com/voc/voctomix

[+] dividuum|9 years ago|reply
And if you have seen the intermission screens and wondered how these work: They run my software info-beamer (https://info-beamer.com/hosted) on a Pi3 in each Hall. Basically those intermission information screens are written in Lua. My info-beamer software uses both hardware accelerated video decoding as well as OpenGL(ES) to make things run smoothly. I'll release the complete Lua source code early next year. If you want to see how these worked last year, take a look at https://github.com/info-beamer/package-32c3-screens
[+] xorcist|9 years ago|reply
The official IRC channels are #33c3-hall-X @hackint. They always take questions from the channels. Almost as good as being there!
[+] adito|9 years ago|reply
it's irc.hackint.org right?
[+] erhardm|9 years ago|reply
I searched through the schedule and didn't find State of the Onion. That's unfortunate.

Security Nightmares seems to be still going. That's always a good talk.

[+] myrion|9 years ago|reply
I think that's to avoid the whole Jakob Appelbaum kerfuffle. Both he and the rest of the TOR leadership were banned from giving talks this year.
[+] camperman|9 years ago|reply
Holding my breath for Wikileaks insurance keys and Phase 3 files hidden in the blockchain.
[+] Mithaldu|9 years ago|reply
Are they doing quality control on submitted talks this year, or are they still fine with talks that spread outright and clear lies to people who come there to learn and don't know any better?

Edit: They still let Rubin talk, so probably no quality control.

[+] lawl|9 years ago|reply
The exploits he presented in high profile perl software are very real, irregardless of if you agree with his reasoning on what is broken or not.

So he gave a talk on exploits he found but you call the talk "outright and clear lies", because you disagree with his conclusion that perl is broken?

[+] k__|9 years ago|reply
Care to elaborate?