top | item 13440888 A $13B Complaint 38 points| granfalloon | 9 years ago |novackmedialaw.com 4 comments order hn newest bognition|9 years ago This reads like a law firm trying to trigger the Streisand effect, not sure why I should care jlardinois|9 years ago > 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan. [Huh?]Why the huh? The author's own point 1 implied the suit was against JP Morgan.> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side. turingbombe|9 years ago Yes the author is asking for the document and believes it should be a non-issue because:> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.To which the DOJ responds:> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.Which is a bit of a confusing response. TaylorAlexander|9 years ago Headline doesn't need the dollar sign and the word "dollar".
bognition|9 years ago This reads like a law firm trying to trigger the Streisand effect, not sure why I should care
jlardinois|9 years ago > 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan. [Huh?]Why the huh? The author's own point 1 implied the suit was against JP Morgan.> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side. turingbombe|9 years ago Yes the author is asking for the document and believes it should be a non-issue because:> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.To which the DOJ responds:> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.Which is a bit of a confusing response.
turingbombe|9 years ago Yes the author is asking for the document and believes it should be a non-issue because:> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.To which the DOJ responds:> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.Which is a bit of a confusing response.
bognition|9 years ago
jlardinois|9 years ago
Why the huh? The author's own point 1 implied the suit was against JP Morgan.
> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.
turingbombe|9 years ago
> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.
To which the DOJ responds:
> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.
Which is a bit of a confusing response.
TaylorAlexander|9 years ago