(no title)
turingbombe | 9 years ago
> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.
To which the DOJ responds:
> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.
Which is a bit of a confusing response.
turingbombe | 9 years ago
> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.
To which the DOJ responds:
> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.
Which is a bit of a confusing response.
No comments yet.