This makes the antenna more directional. It increases the range in one direction while decreasing it in every other direction, so I'm not sure how well this would work for most people without relocating the router/AP.
That being said, it's a clever bit of engineering.
Given that it's only somewhat directional, this would actually be useful for the common case that the AP sits in a corner of a one-story house. No sense sending all that RF energy outside, so direct it inside.
My current (rental) place has the router and AP in one corner of the apartment, so signal strength at the other end is terrible. Is there a better (cheap but effective) option than this?
Good intuitions. FCC regulations restrict EIRP[0], which is essentially "what is the signal strength in the strongest direction". It's possible that increasing directionality of your antenna puts you over the EIRP limit (given how routers already try to get _really_ close to it to improve performance).
So this makes the router sends a stronger signal, farther. But how does this help if my laptop still has the same wifi adapter and can't send a strong signal back?
It also makes the antenna more sensitive in the direction its pointing. The elements make the antenna more directional, sort of focusing the energy. This increases the transmit side by concentrating the energy into a smaller area, but the same effect also helps it collect more energy.
The trade-off is worse performance perpendicular to the extra elements.
Antennas are coupled. Transmitting is receiving, and receiving is transmitting.
When you pull on a chain or a rope, it doesn't matter if the other side is "receiving" the pull, or "sending" it. The two sides are physically coupled.
Similarly, antennas are physically coupled to each other. Increase the gain on one side, the other side still benefits. You're physically connecting a "rope" of electrons over the air.
You might start at the ARRL's Antennas page [0] and consider the ARRL Antenna Book [1]. Most of that is aimed at amateur radio in particular but the theory is the same.
There's tons of free and/or open-source software (of varying quality) for modeling antennas and such as well.
Take a microwave design class. This would be a second or third course after electrostatic, electrodynamics, then something like microwave theory. At my school we had to petition for the course as a special section. It was great, we built cavity resonators, and final project was an antenna design. All the way from theory, then using modern fea antenna software, and then building it and testing performance. If you have any interest take it. I was not going to but the professor said: "Phil, what's the lower end of the microwave spectrum?", I said "1 GHz", he then asked "How fast is your computer?", I replied "2.8 GHz", He said "I'll see you next semester then?". these days having an understanding of microwave theory will help you no matter your specialization.
1. Find a university course on RF, look up the course textbooks.
In my university we had several courses on "analog electronics" which covered topics like free space path loss and RF concepts (e.g. bandpass filters).
2. Use Google or another search engine (DDG) to find the book in PDF or EPUB version.
3. Enjoy reading the book without forking over hundreds of dollars to a greedy publisher.
if my router has 3 antennas, is there any point to installing it only on one of them? my intuition that's based on exactly no RF experience whatsoever tells me that it'll do more harm than good. (case is weak 5GHz signal in the corner of a house.)
Depends. Some routers have multiple antennas because there are multiple transceivers inside it, and some technologies (i.e. MU-MIMO in 802.11AC) will most likely react strangely having one of their antenna modified. In the end, it would probably make your performance even worse.
theres a two reasons your router probably has 3 antennas:
-beamforming
-split 2.4ghz/5ghz/5ghz-wave2 antennas
if your router is using those three antennas for beamforming, you might trigger some strange behavior if you yagi a single one of them.
if run into issues and can turn beamforming off, you should be able to yagi a single one no problem.
if your router pumps each antenna into a separate radio, then you can reliably pump a single radio into that corner of your house w/ a yagi. however, you won't have seamless roaming between the 2.4ghz and 5ghz networks when you move into and out of that corner of your home.
i recommend getting a mesh network, they're the bees knees and are a huge step above the traditional access point + range extenders model
No, Yagis have a single driven element like a dipole, and you have longer elements behind the driven element (reflectors), and shorter elements in front (directors I think?).
interestingly, the antenna optimizer (AO) software uses genetic algorithm to find the right the antenna topology, therefore, this antenna is not designed, it's evolved. more details can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_antenna
[+] [-] mediocrejoker|9 years ago|reply
That being said, it's a clever bit of engineering.
[+] [-] colanderman|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fovc|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bjackman|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] modeless|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aray|9 years ago|reply
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalent_isotropically_radia...
[+] [-] swiley|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] agumonkey|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] turbohedgehog|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] diminoten|9 years ago|reply
Because it's illegal, is why.
[+] [-] vinhboy|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stephen_g|9 years ago|reply
The trade-off is worse performance perpendicular to the extra elements.
[+] [-] microcolonel|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anotheryou|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dragontamer|9 years ago|reply
When you pull on a chain or a rope, it doesn't matter if the other side is "receiving" the pull, or "sending" it. The two sides are physically coupled.
Similarly, antennas are physically coupled to each other. Increase the gain on one side, the other side still benefits. You're physically connecting a "rope" of electrons over the air.
[+] [-] bbayer|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bsamuels|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MayeulC|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jlgaddis|9 years ago|reply
There's tons of free and/or open-source software (of varying quality) for modeling antennas and such as well.
[0]: http://www.arrl.org/antennas
[1]: https://www.arrl.org/shop/ARRL-Antenna-Book-23rd-Softcover-E...
[+] [-] Cerium|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kogepathic|9 years ago|reply
In my university we had several courses on "analog electronics" which covered topics like free space path loss and RF concepts (e.g. bandpass filters).
2. Use Google or another search engine (DDG) to find the book in PDF or EPUB version.
3. Enjoy reading the book without forking over hundreds of dollars to a greedy publisher.
[+] [-] crwu|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baq|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geforce|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bsamuels|9 years ago|reply
-beamforming
-split 2.4ghz/5ghz/5ghz-wave2 antennas
if your router is using those three antennas for beamforming, you might trigger some strange behavior if you yagi a single one of them. if run into issues and can turn beamforming off, you should be able to yagi a single one no problem.
if your router pumps each antenna into a separate radio, then you can reliably pump a single radio into that corner of your house w/ a yagi. however, you won't have seamless roaming between the 2.4ghz and 5ghz networks when you move into and out of that corner of your home.
i recommend getting a mesh network, they're the bees knees and are a huge step above the traditional access point + range extenders model
[+] [-] anfractuosity|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kale|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tumblen|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mojoB|9 years ago|reply
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/how-to-bluesniper-pt1,review-408...
[+] [-] ramgorur|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amgin3|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HNSucksAss|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]