(no title)
nrjdhsbsid | 9 years ago
The US would be far better off allowing the same number of people in but only those highly educated or those with a lot of money or status. It sounds mean but job of the US govt is not to rescue poor people in third world countries, it's to benefit it's citizens.
Imagine if instead of 6-8 million illegal immigrants with largely low educations, limited English skills and earning potential, no money, and no status we let in 6 million CEO's, scientists, politicians, and billionaires. It's hard to argue that the current situation is in any way "better"
jaimebuelta|9 years ago
Most ilegal immigrants want to move towards a legal status and integrate successfully in the country.
The "burden" of ilegal immigrants is mostly false.
nrjdhsbsid|9 years ago
This would lead to the country being completely overwhelmed like is happening in Europe. Did Germany stop letting in unlimited refugees because they were helping the country so much?
pcwalton|9 years ago
Yes, it does. Empirically.
> A country is not a charity.
Countries are obliged to admit refugees.
> It sounds mean but job of the US govt is not to rescue poor people in third world countries, it's to benefit it's citizens.
"Mean" is an interesting way to put "contrary to domestic and international laws and universal human rights [1]".
[1]: See the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 14.
fdsaaf|9 years ago
[deleted]
tptacek|9 years ago
But neither my beliefs nor those of Donald Trump are material here. The laws of this country forbid the kind of discrimination Trump has enacted, and have forbad it throughout multiple cycles of challenge and pushback.