Related is the story of Soviet maps. The Soviets had engaged in a monumental effort to map the world and then during the collapse in one of the republics the classified stack of maps got in the hands of Westerners:
I own a couple of these maps covering the area I grew up in (Western Norway). In some respects, the Soviet general staff mapping is more detailed than the maps from the Norwegian mapping authority - they even showed a pile of wood in our back yard! (Presumably misidentified it as an outhouse)
An educated guess is they simply bought a set of the commercially available mapping, then compared it to satellite imagery and added their own points of interest.
1980s CIA album has map of central Moscow. On it, subway stations and embassies are marked (that's the expected), gas stations (okay) and also churches (what's weird).
Nothing more, just embassies and churches. Would like to hear a story here.
Baghdad's 2003 map has basically the same set of POI.
I'm not sure that's censored, at least by Google, I think it's just bad data. The copyright at higher zooms is shown as NASA, which would have used Landsat. In the Landsat archive, there are numerous satellite images for that region, though low quality: https://landsatlook.usgs.gov/viewer.html
Seems likely nobody at Google has taken the effort to do anything about it because who uses Google Maps to look at antarctica?
To those saying it's a military installation or SIGINT thing, I very very seriously doubt it. The Antarctic Treaty explicitly forbids military activity and an installation might be blockable by Google Maps but no one country has a monopoly on imaging satellites. It'd be seen and start a diplomatic shitstorm.
I would guess that this was a gap in coverage from one source of data, that was filled in with data from another. The edges just try and blend the two sources together.
Google will censor just about anything if a government asks them to and claims it's for national security. Hell, they even do it for the uber-rich independent of government.
[+] [-] rdtsc|9 years ago|reply
https://www.sovietmaps.com/
Here is a longer article about it:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/secret-cold-war-maps/
And also the map of San Francisco from the 80s:
http://i.imgur.com/SdmmFUd.jpg
[+] [-] lb1lf|9 years ago|reply
An educated guess is they simply bought a set of the commercially available mapping, then compared it to satellite imagery and added their own points of interest.
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] cm2187|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] khanan|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] guard-of-terra|9 years ago|reply
Nothing more, just embassies and churches. Would like to hear a story here.
Baghdad's 2003 map has basically the same set of POI.
[+] [-] Cieplak|9 years ago|reply
https://www.google.com/maps/place/70%C2%B010'04.0%22S+87%C2%...
Satellite map images with missing or unclear data:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_map_images_with_miss...
[+] [-] Veratyr|9 years ago|reply
Seems likely nobody at Google has taken the effort to do anything about it because who uses Google Maps to look at antarctica?
To those saying it's a military installation or SIGINT thing, I very very seriously doubt it. The Antarctic Treaty explicitly forbids military activity and an installation might be blockable by Google Maps but no one country has a monopoly on imaging satellites. It'd be seen and start a diplomatic shitstorm.
[+] [-] topkekz|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 7952|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] knz|9 years ago|reply
Or a giant ruse to divert attention from elsewhere.
[+] [-] arca_vorago|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] westmeal|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rhizome|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] borgdr|9 years ago|reply
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ciagov/5988128522/in/album-721...
[+] [-] Karunamon|9 years ago|reply
If so, it's a case study in how that power is misused...
[+] [-] unknown|9 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] colinthompson|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jacobolus|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fafner|9 years ago|reply