[meister]

DO is cheap, you can achieve scaling and failover for a lower fee than with AWS. Their new load balancing solution is nice but lacks features and its price is 3x higher than what we provide at https://pikacloud.com.

[_wmd]

This is a short term illusion, with instance reservations and the wider variety of storage options available, AWS can work out cheaper even for small accounts.

Source: spent a several days in December cost modelling a few services for a client, was surprised by the result

[sidlls]

I have been under the impression that structuring a system to use AWS with portability in mind ends up costing as much or more than optimizing the structure for AWS such that one is effectively locked-in at scale. That's a trade-off that has to be factored in to a decision.

I mean granted I've only done rough guesstimates for some toy applications for myself and some friends and family, so I could be totally off base here.

[disiplus]

you can run this yourself with ngnix but if you have everything inside DO then the ability to easily add new droplets is great. create droplets on demand from snapshots, add them to load balance and you are ready.

[corobo]

> Pay as you use. Hourly rate, monthly billing.

Nah. I pay monthly, include monthly pricing. I can probably set up an nginx/varnish instance faster than I can calculate the monthly cost when you're billing by the hour.

[falcolas]

You aren't the audience, then. These offerings are for people who don't want to manage an nginx/varnish stack.

One thing that is nice is the automatic failover (of the routing stack) when a VM or datacenter goes down.

[meister]

Billing is based on usage for load balancers. You can't offer fixed monthly fee as users may consume all of your network or system capacity and pay as if they were using nothing. This is not a sustainable business.