Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.

[jfr]

Firefox can do that as well:

chrome://browser/content/browser.xul

Ok... that is cheating...

[ashleyw]

For anyone intrigued: http://grab.by/4wnv

[ronaldj]

This is dumb. This is awesome: http://ukijs.org/mail/index.html

[chaosmachine]

It's neat, but I really expected some kind of iframe, so you could browse inside it.

[thunk]

And of course the first page I'd visit with it would be itself. And again. And again.

[proexploit]

I opened it up in Chrome first. I'd have lost my mind if Firefox was running in an iFrame. :)

[jarek]

It would have been nice if they didn't use so many -webkit- properties (I counted 34) so that other browsers could at least have a shot at rendering it. Several properties they use are supported by Opera if given the chance.

[thristian]

It's hardly "built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3" if they're using proprietary -webkit- properties rather than CSS3 properties.

[TrevorBurnham]

Looks awful on the iPad. I guess Safari Mobile still has some catching up to do with its desktop sibling.

[jay_kyburz]

Looks awful on chrome too.

[luna]

In the real (physical) world (you remember, that infinitely large thing outside of your computer), this is simply called a "mirror".

It's not producing something, it's looking itself in the mirror: attention: vanity is waiting!

[lisper]

Is the background also image-free? That seems much more impressive to me than the browser window (and the browser window is pretty impressive.)

[proexploit]

It's not image free, but it would technically be possible with CSS only (except for the kind of glow effect) albeit a nightmare to try.

[minalecs]

the colors of the close, minimize and expand aren't correct, so not entirely accurate. Still awesome

[bombs]

They're correct if you have your appearance settings set to Graphite instead of Blue.

[proexploit]

This makes me want to give it a try, but then I realize the amount of time involved...

[mrtron]

Built by Xzibit?

[iamdave]

Yo dawg, I heard you like the internet, so we put a browser in your browser so you can meme while you meme

[drivebyacct]

Why is this so proud of using HTML5/CSS3 and no images, when the site General Metrics seems to imply that they value Photoshop over non-PS methods.

// We help design agencies build websites and web applications.

if ( Photoshop > (TextMate || Coda) ) { contactUs (”email”); }

[ido]

I read it as: if you prefer to use photoshop (i.e. you are a graphics designer that wants to just send a mock-up and have it implemented) you should contact them.

[puns]

I think it's just their way of saying they're looking to hire a graphic designer as opposed to programmers, not their design philosophy.

[atanok]

The joke is that (TextMate || Coda) as any OR operation, returns either 0 or 1, so if Photoshop is >=2 then that if condition is always true, regardless of the value of TextMate and Coda.